User talk:216.113.168.136

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 216.113.168.136, is registered to eBay and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact eBay to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link.
  • Your own user page.
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address.
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
  • The ability to start new pages.
  • The ability to rename pages.
  • The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
  • The ability to upload images.
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
  • The eligibility to become an administrator.
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections.
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. Mushroom 17:35, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] External links

Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, the commercial links/content you added were inappropriate, as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and should not be used for advertising or a collection of external links. See the welcome page if you'd like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia.

Please do not add links to:

Thanks, --A. B. (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

The netyarn.com link continued to be added after this warning by another anonymous editor, 67.186.226.58 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log)
See also the discussion at Talk:Amateur writing#netyarn.com spam. --A. B. (talk) 04:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Harry Morton

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. - Only properly sourced or cited contributions are accepted in Wikipedia per WP:CITE. --Ate Pinay (talk•email) 04:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


Please,Stop writing in the Paradise Lost's article that they are doom. This is your personal oppinion.And it is written in a rude way.There are no sources that consider PL to be just a doom band.I even don't think they were gothic-doom but whatever... They were death-doom.But after that they showed goth rock influences and more polished sound. They are the godfathers of Gothic metal.They started the movement.They influences many new bands. I listen to a lot of gothic metal bands.May be you should do it and you'll see that PL is gothic metal. Yeah the two genres may be similar but PL are gothic metal. Xr 1 17:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Not only is it your point of view that Paradise Lost is Doom, but you have no sources or anything to back this up. If you continue your edits in this fashion you will be reported and possibly blocked. This is your warning. Discontinue your edit warring and POV on Paradise Lost. You edits are bordering on vandalism. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 18:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
You obviously did not get it. The next time you edit that page in the same fashion as before you will be reported and most likely blocked. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 19:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Paradise Lost (band). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The edit in question is here. Thank you. — Satori Son 19:54, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

You may have fooled others, but I'm pretty sure you're a vandal. Next time I ask for a block it will be granted if you continue to institute WP:CON and WP:POV. I don't realy care that you removed the links, though you gave no reason and it was therfore reverted, but Paradise Lost is not doom metal and it has been discussed so get over it. They were death/doom and then gothic metal and along the way they experimented with gothic synth rock stuff. Never doom metal, though. If you wanna discuss things, do so, but do not pucsh your pov and offer no explanation again. Blizzard Beast $ODIN$ 23:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked for a period of disruptive editing of Paradise Lost (band): repeatedly reinserting unsourced and arguably subjective claims with neither sources nor edit summaries nor explanations on the talk page. for 24 hours. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Almond, you will be blocked from editing. Dekisugi (talk) 09:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Regarding the history section of the death/doom page

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive, was identified as vandalism, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

[edit] January 2008

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Phil Lewis. Thank you. VC 04:30, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Joey Jordison, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver (talk) 05:00, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Cult. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bulbous (talk) 04:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Stars on 45 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. ➪HiDrNick! 05:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)