User talk:216.110.205.5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Re: Jesus. There are problems with nearly all depictions of Jesus. Artists, particularly in more ancient times, tended to make historical/religious individuals more like themselves. In addition, historical research of the subjects was not available. Now, if this bothers you, then I suggest you find a public domain picture showing baptism by immersion that is also true to the styles of dress and ethnic backgroud of Jesus. Be positive with your criticism (by suggesting a different picture) and see how that goes. Good luck. Ted 21:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Edits on the Jesus article

Please join our discussion on the Talk page for the Jesus article (click the 'discussion' link at the top of the article link bar). The use of the image in question has been discussed, and if you would like to weigh in with an opinion, or want to request a clarification in the article, or the image caption, please join us. However, your rapid editing against consensus is borderline vandalism. Phidauex 21:42, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Please also be aware that you are in violation of WP:3RR for rapid reversions. Regardless of the merits of your claim, violations of 3RR can lead to your being blocked. Ted 21:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- KOS | talk 14:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] John Kerry

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Aude (talk contribs) 14:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. --Aude (talk contribs) 14:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edit to Kea article

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Kea, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Avenue 03:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. YbborT 19:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to USC Athletics

Your recent edit to USC Athletics (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 19:35, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Recent edits

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Brett Favre. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. —TheMuuj Talk 20:33, 9 September 2006 (UTC)