User talk:213.48.73.89

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 213.48.73.89, is registered to Ericsson-Bham University and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thanks for experimenting with the page Nanyang Girls' High School on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. WLU 21:21, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Craig Beattie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Neranei (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Software engineering, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Software engineering was changed by 213.48.73.89 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2007-11-16T01:03:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 01:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Five Go Mad in Dorset. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Terra Xin (talk) 01:22, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ranch dressing, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ranch dressing was changed by 213.48.73.89 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-11-20T12:35:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 12:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Worcester Foregate Street railway station, you will be blocked from editing. —Animum (talk) 18:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unexplained removal

Can you please explain why you deleted information from the article Diaper? While I realise the subject matter be somewhat controversial, it was sourced, and "I don't like it" is not a valid reason to remove info. Coop41 (talk) 14:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

I've reverted you again on the diaper article. Just because you don't approve of something doesn't mean we shouldn't cover it on this site. If you have a valid reason to remove the info, please discuss. Coop41 (talk) 11:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your continued vandalism

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hover Fly, you will be blocked from editing. Mfield (talk) 12:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You have been blocked

For persistent vandalism and in light of all the warnings you've already received, you have been blocked for 48 hours. Please cease undermining the work of others and in future edit constructively --Fir0002 23:35, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. You may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did to Hoverfly, makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ffm 21:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nottingham City Transport, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. ffm 21:40, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hoverfly, you will be blocked from editing. Mfield (talk) 04:45, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Diaper, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Coop41 (talk) 00:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Urban legend, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. — TheBilly(Talk) 19:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edit to McBurney's point (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Buckhurst Hill has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks Astral (talk) 02:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Kieran Palmer has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Snowolf How can I help? 12:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Glenn Whelan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Glenn Whelan was changed by 213.48.73.89 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2008-01-31T23:47:07+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nautical mile. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Gerry Ashton (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The King's School, Grantham. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.

Keith D (talk) 20:02, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alessandro Del Piero, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alessandro Del Piero was changed by 213.48.73.89 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-20T00:19:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wayne Rooney, you will be blocked from editing. JNW (talk) 00:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chav, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Roleplayer (talk) 01:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Field hockey, you will be blocked from editing. Roleplayer (talk) 01:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to R v Nedrick, you will be blocked from editing. Roleplayer (talk) 01:34, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Andy D'Urso, you will be blocked from editing. Ref (chew)(do) 15:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any edits, please ignore this warning.

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article The King's School, Ely. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Mbimmler (talk) 16:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Morton Sports Day, you will be blocked from editing. Fabrictramp (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


You have been blocked for a period of 2 weeks from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

WjBscribe 20:29, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Syphilis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Razorflame Report false positives 00:17, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to President of Nigeria. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —LOL (talk) 00:11, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Pluralism (political theory) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Closedmouth (talk) 10:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)