User talk:213.235.24.138

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This username is an alternate account of 82.19.66.37.
This username is an alternate account of 130.88.168.152.
This username is an alternate account of 82.0.206.215.
This username is an alternate account of Step13thirteen.




Contents

[edit] Your Edits To Alcoholics Anonymous: [1] [2]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alcoholics Anonymous. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. — Craigtalbert 15:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to Talk:Alcoholics Anonymous [3]

As stated before, my contributions to the talk page are valid. If you keep deleting them, I will report you for vandalism. Deleting talk page contributions contradicts Wikipedia:Vandalism, as per the following paragraph "Discussion page vandalism Blanking the posts of other users from talk pages other than your own, Wikipedia space, and other discussions, aside from removing internal spam, vandalism, etc., is generally considered vandalism. An obvious exception is moving posts to a proper place (e.g. protection requests to WP:RFPP). Removing personal attacks is often considered legitimate, and it is considered acceptable to archive an overly long talk page by creating an archive page and moving the text from the main talk page there. The above rules do not apply to a user's own talk page, where this policy does not itself prohibit the removal and archival of comments at the user's discretion."

Please do not do this again without discussing it with me. I have very little patience and will be reporting it as vandalism in the future. 213.235.24.138 11:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll tell you what I told you before: report me, see what happens. Until then, it's my opinion that you are not using the talk page appropriately, and I will revert per Wikipedia is not a forum. -- Craigtalbert 12:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Sure, but blanking talk pages is vandalism, which kind of supercedes the three revert rule (I am sure that it doesn't apply in cases of vandalism....), so this kind of doesn't matter.

I am more than happy for arbitration. Basically, anything which will help me get some more sources allowed into the AA thing (and thus reach "concensus", in the true sense, as well as the wiki sense) is fine with me. 213.235.24.138 12:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Blanking talk pages is vandalism. Removing violations of WP:FORUM and WP:TALK, isn't. I have seen you "report" me, and I've noticed that the admins have ignored it. It seems there's not a lot of support for your argument. -- Craigtalbert 13:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Streets

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page The Streets worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. faithless (speak) 11:06, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to The Streets, you will be blocked from editing. faithless (speak) 20:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.