User talk:210.80.154.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your recent contribution to the article cancer was, shall we say, controversial. I note that someone else has deleted them. On the other hand, the strength of Wikipedia is exactly this : the cohabitation of orthodox and non-orthodox views on a subject. I suggests that:

  • You get yourself a user name, write something about you in your user page, and stop this anonymous, stealth editing. Be proud of your opinions, damit!
  • Try again to explain your point in the article, but this time be much more concise. No need for a list of reference; a link to an external web site will suffice.
  • Do not destroy someone's argument unless you check it first. Your original text is simply full of blatant lies. Admitedly, you might have to dig a bit. For example, the proof that surgery cures cancer has been published a long time ago (try the 1950's) and the articles will probably not show up on routine Medline searches.
  • Any theory should try to explain ALL that is known. Can you explain why squamous cell carcinoma of the lung is seen almost exclusively in smokers? That its incidence has decreased over the century, replaced with adenocarcinoma of the lung? That in 1969, as many women died of cancer of the cervix and of lung, whereas in 2000, lung cancer kills about 15 times more women than cervical cancer? (Canadian stats). That the most frequent cancer in Africa is hepatocellular carcinoma, a very rare disease in North America?

If you have answers to these questions, email me (see my user page). Emmanuelm 20:00, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Immigration Restriction Act 1901. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. shoeofdeath 05:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)