User talk:210.0.212.59

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Vandalism Warning

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tibet, you will be blocked from editing. You removed cited content. If you disagree with edits you seee, you place a dubious tag and you discuss. In the case of Tibet being South Asian although it is not universally accepted, it is greatly accepted enough to merit a mention on the Tibet article. University sources are academic sources accepted by Wikipedia. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 05:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Also if you want to be a wikipedia editor, it would be best that you register Thegreyanomaly (talk) 05:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Further vandalism

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to South Asia, you will be blocked from editing.

The debate over the issue occurred in October 2006 with an anonymous ip user like yourself. All the university citations makes it justifies a mention on the page. Note that "For assumed geographic, cultural, and/or historical reasons, the following countries and territories are, sometimes to often, included in South Asia" is put before it. Tibet is culturally more aligned towards South Asia in some respects (religion, writing script, language group Tibeto-Burman is popular in Bhutan and parts of India whereas its absent in Central Asia). Historically, the regions have been related. Enough academics accept it for it to be worth a mention on the page. The same is true for Afghanistan. People fought and took it off, we found citations that justified it and put it back on on a "sometimes to often, included" list. And since than, no single user has brought up a debate on whether that is too much of an addition. Also, calling a view "crappy politcal-propaganda POV" without explaining why serves no purpose. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR warning

Please see 3RR If you were to revert South Asia at the moment, you will have committed four reverts in the last 24 hours. If you do not desist for at least a few hours, I have the ability to put you up on a noticeboard which will ban you for at least 24 hour. Thegreyanomaly (talk) 04:26, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Please desist from edit warring at the South Asia article. If you say something on the talk page, back it up with reliable sources if other editors request it, and please remember that just because you've posted something on the talk page doesn't give you the right to automatically apply changes. Wait until you've discussed it with other editors before changing the article. If you continue to edit war, you will be reported to the 3RR noticeboard. Please take what I've said into consideration. Regards, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 05:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Civility

Please try to be more civil when communicating with other editors. I'm referring to this edit you made on User:Thegreyanomaly's talk page. Remember to stay cool when the editing gets hot! Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 04:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)