User talk:209.247.5.227

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to About Us (Darkchild Remix)

Your recent edit to About Us (Darkchild Remix) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:27, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Chorus line. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Michaelas10 (Talk) 16:49, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Image:Angemon2.jpg:

Your recent edit to Image:Angemon2.jpg (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 15:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Kylie Minogue

Could you please stop repeatedly adding back extraneous category tags to the Kylie Minogue article, without discussing this edit first on the talk page? A consensus has been reached previously: Talk:Kylie Minogue#Category cleanup. Please state your rationale there and achieve consensus first, per Wikipedia policy. Also, please provide an edit summary when making changes to an article. I have reverted your edit, pending discussion on the talk page. Thank you. --Plek 21:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I see that you continue to make the same edit over and over again, without discussing its justification on the talk page. This edit has been reverted. Making changes to Wikipedia articles without achieving consensus on the talk page first can be seen as disruptive. I urge you strongly to discuss your proposed changes first. Thank you. --Plek 05:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Also, are you actually the same user as 209.244.43.34 (talk • contribs • WHOIS), by the way? --Plek 05:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Kylie Minogue, you will be blocked from editing. --Plek 22:51, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from an article. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Arjun 03:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Issue raised on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello. As a result of your repeated deletion of discussion on Talk:Kylie Minogue, your account and its alleged sockpuppets have now been reported at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:JJonathan and socks at Talk:Kylie Minogue. You are invited to explain your actions there. Thanks. --Plek 22:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Kylie Minogue

Hi. Your edits have been reverted because they are disputed. In such a case, the thing to do (in accordance with official Wikipedia policy) is to discuss the matter on the article's talk page. Please state what the exact reasons are for your edits and work out a consensus. --Plek 21:35, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

. SGGH 23:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AFD vandalism

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated., also sock of JJonathan.Rlevse 01:08, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

  • For sock proof, see entry to user page I just made. Rlevse 01:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)