User talk:209.244.42.97

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] 48 Prophets

Please do not change >< back to ? this means i have verified with a believers of said faith that said person is not considered a prophet also just because someone is considered a prophet in judaism doesn't mean they are in christianity the jews have many other religious text such as the talmud just because the talmud says someone is a prophet does not mean it is explicatily said so in the bible and thus questioned by Christians--Java7837 00:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Noah is not considered a prophet by christians or jews--Java7837 18:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Joseph is not considered a prophet by Jews either no Jewish text refers to Joseph as a prophet at all finally Ruth isn't either also Job is not considered a prophet by Christians though be considered such by Jews and Muslims please explain your recent edits on my talk page and ezra and nehemiah also are not considered prophets by jews and not christians please provide a source for this claim http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_prophets does not list ruth job joseph noah ezra nor nehemiah as prophets please provide a source and do not edit the jewish section I am an orthodox jew and know who is a prophet and who is not in judaism--Java7837 19:00, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
I apologize Joseph is considered a prophet by christians though none of the others that u have added are considered prophets--Java7837 19:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
It is true that Ezra, Nechemia, Joseph, Ruth and Noah are not considered prophets in the Jewish theology of the prophets. See User:Rachack/48 Prophets for the list of the prophets and see the comments on the TALK page of Template talk:Prophets of the Tanakh. Thank you. רח"ק | Talk | Contribs 19:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


Why do u insist on keeping Ezra, Nechemia, Joseph, Ruth and Noah as prophets under Judaism i told u they aren't and רח"ק has told you they aren't too--Java7837 19:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


Please explain which Christian denomination or denominations considers Ezra Nehemiah Job and Ruth as Prophets--Java7837 19:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


I will make you a deal if u can find one jewish text where Noah is called a prophet i will become a christian here is a list to start with Zohar Tanakh Bahir Sefer Yetzirah Midrash Rabba Pirke de Rabbi Eliezer Sefer haYashar Guide for the Perplexed Midrash Tanchuma Talmud Jerusalem Talmud Rashi's commentary etc. --Java7837 19:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


You used http://www.jewfaq.org/prophet.htm as a source for your claim that Adam was a prophet yet i went through it and guess what Adam isn't on the list--Java7837 19:43, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


I am telling you please explain to me why you think Noah is a prophet in Judaism talking to G-d is not the only requirement--Java7837 19:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Table of Prophets of Abrahamic Religions suggestion

Do you think we should add a seperate column for mormonism or not?--Java7837 20:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Can u plz answer the above question--Java7837 20:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


And also why did u put ? for krishna for judaism look let me explain if they are not mentioned in the Bible there is no way jews would accept them as a prophet--Java7837 20:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] American Eskimo Dog

Please see talk:American Eskimo Dog in re the origins of the breed. There are several issues with recent edits, but that's the irreducible one. Geogre 01:18, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kadesh

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:12, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but you have received 3 warnings prior to mine recently. According to Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace#Multi level templates, you are at Level 4, which is "Assumes bad faith; strong cease and desist, last warning". I'm actually nice to give you a warning suitable for level 3. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[1], [2], [3]. Warning stack up even if it's handed out by different users. OhanaUnitedTalk page 19:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Diffs for POV reverts on a single article list of stations for the Exodus

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

16:42, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Red Sea - Exodus station (removed probably wrongly added template) (top)
16:41, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Red Sea - Exodus station (added correct template syntax)
16:40, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Red Sea - Exodus station (removed template in which its content is covered in other templates)
16:39, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Red Sea - Exodus station (added disputed template and OR template due to comments on the talk page)
16:37, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Red Sea - Exodus station (removed unneeded syntax)
16:37, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Red Sea - Exodus station (Reverted additions of OR, POV content, and inaccurate and misleading information and maps created by user who added them + added basic info + rmd uneeded spaces + wikified a little + added templates)
16:32, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Ra mes ses (again modified delete template)
16:29, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Ra mes ses (reverted own mistake)
16:29, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Ra mes ses (tweaked delete template)
16:28, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Ra mes ses (added delete template)
16:26, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Etham (Reverted POV and vandalization of article + removed inaccurate map which was created by the user who added it) (top)
16:25, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Rhind Mathematical Papyrus (→Influence of the RMP - added OR. template) (top)
16:24, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Pi-hahiroth (→External links - removed improper syntax) (top)
16:23, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Pi-hahiroth (added template due to the fact that I forgot to add it)
16:22, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Pi-hahiroth (edited section name for a more transwikipedian uniformity +corrected bad referencers +moved section to more suitable location + removed errant spaces + added unref. template +added ORsection template)
16:18, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Wilderness of Sin (Removed another unneeded space) (top)
16:17, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Wilderness of Sin (→Notes and citations - Removed unneeded spaces + renamed section to a uniformed transwikipedia style.)
16:16, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Wilderness of Sin (Reverted additions of POV + inaccurate map created by the user who added it.)
16:15, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Pi-hahiroth (Added unref. template)
16:15, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Pi-hahiroth (Reverted addition of inaccurate map made personally by the same user.)
16:13, August 5, 2007 (hist) (diff) Elim (Bible) (another unneeded space removed) (top)

This combines WP:3RR, WP:NPOV, WP:RV V and more of the same complained about above under Kadesh Rktect 01:24, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Please sign your comments. And im sorry if you see unfairness in my reveersions, but your edits were not constructive and removed article content, opposed consensus, added unreferenced claims, added sloppy grammer and syntax, added POV, amongst other un-welcomed edits.209.244.42.97 20:29, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
The above diffs show your changes to the station list were done without even taking the time to read them, You blanked content to the detriment of the encyclopedia. You made no attempt to discuss this on the talk page and you have been warned for this at least three times before.Rktect 01:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
No they don't. You have been led to assume that I took no time to view its content, which I did, sorry to say. I blanked nothing, and most content was added by yourself, and was POV, uncited material, and original research, more than enough to qualify for deletion. All was added by you, a user with a history of disruption that has been blocked 3 times previously for his edits. I made no attempt to discuss it because pretty much all of my edits were reinforced by your history as a disruption to Wikipedia and being, simply put, a vandal, as well as many users reverting your edits and reversions. 209.244.42.97 21:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your ClueBot FalsePositive report.

I have responded to your false positive report for ClueBot. See here. Thanks, Cobi 19:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Again? Whats up with you Bot? One bit short of a Megabit, it seems.209.244.42.97 20:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, perhaps I should make it ignore IP users with 250 or more edits. For now, I have added you to the whitelist. Cobi 20:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
I have fixed the bot. Please let me know if it reverts you anymore. Cobi 20:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
209.244.42.97's report has been reopened due to concerns here and here. Cobi 02:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit summary comments

Will you please stop making threatening edit summaries accusing my and other peoples edits as vandalism such as follows [1]. Please read Wikipedia:Vandalism on what is vandalism - I am quite sure my edits do not count as this. Further reading includes WP:AGF and Wikipedia:Avoid the word "vandal". Camaron1 | Chris 09:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Claims of consensus

Please do not make unilateral edits and then claim there is a consensus when there is no or minimal discussion on the matter. JoshuaZ 01:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

More than 3 users involved in an article in 24 hours sure seems like consensus.209.244.42.97 21:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit war at SimCity Societies

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SimCity Societies. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. There is currently a discussion occurring on the talk page on the issue - please join in before reverting edits further. A reason would be helpful on why this detail on fan reaction is needed, and how it follows Wikipedia policies on inclusion. Camaron1 | Chris 14:58, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Alsace

Hey, I noticed that you've made a huge number of POV edits to the Alsace page without discussing them on the talk page first. You've also left the infoboxes in a bit of a mess. Also, a number of wikilinks now point to the wrong things and the formatting of the text in a number of places is now corrupt. I'm reverting your edits back to the last version before you edited and would ask you to discuss your wholesale changes on the talk page to achieve a consensus. You're clearly in conflict with at least one other editor and I believe the best approach is to discuss your proposed changes before going ahead with them. The Rambling Man 07:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Shabtuna‎ Image:EXODUS ACROSS THE RED SEA.png Makheloth‎ Avaris‎ Squaring the circle Zuzim‎ Zamzummim‎ Qetesh‎ Wilderness of Sin‎ Rissah‎ Passage of the Red Sea‎ Kehelathah‎ Red Sea - Exodus station Elim (Bible)‎ Rephidim‎ Mount Shapher‎ Dophkah‎ Libnah‎ Kadesh‎ Haradah‎ Pi-hahiroth‎ Etham‎

[edit] Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Discussion

Hello 209.244.42.97. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue that you may be involved with. The discussion can be found under the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP user apparently wikistalking Rktect. You are free to comment at the discussion but please remember to keep your comments within the bounds of the civility and "no personal attack" policies. Thank you.

 --Dynaflow babble 08:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Mardi Gras has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 01:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your macron stubs

They really aren't necessary, we're much better off with redirects. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hound has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Sceptre (talk) 22:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)