User talk:209.217.75.171

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] December 2007

Your recent edit to Rachel Marsden (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 02:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Brusegadi (talk) 02:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Intention

Please be careful, I do not know if this is your intention but you are removing content (perhaps your browser is not loading up properly.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brusegadi (talk • contribs) 02:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Brusegadi (talk) 03:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I am conforming to WP:BLP and to the Rachel Marsden Arbcomm decision and my edits are not subject to the 3RR. 209.217.75.171 (talk) 03:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
BLP applies for non sourced issues, those criticisms are sourced so they are fair game. I doubt such arb decision exists, provide a link to it or your words are taken as an attempt to intimidate, which will not work. Brusegadi (talk) 03:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)


You should check before you write. I assure you the Arbcomm decision exists. 209.217.75.171 (talk) 03:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)