User talk:209.2.60.97

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 209.2.60.97, is registered to Brooklyn Public Library and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. Attempts to vandalize using this address will be reported to Brooklyn Public Library as network abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.


Umm who are you, what is your normal user account. Could you make a post on its talk page w/ the unblock request and a link to your ip please -- Tawker 18:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Pointless edits

You are wasting your time by trying to place the edits you are doing. Wikipedia autobots are programmed to spot certain edits and immediately revert them. Your edits fall within that category. Continued editing will only result in your IP address being blocked. Richard Harvey 19:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prince discography

If you want to add a column to the albums table, please do not remove an already-existing column and replace it with yours. Also, do not add worldwide sales figures without a proper source to back it up. Thanks. - eo 19:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)


Test

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

ss

Your recent edit to Armistead (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:35, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Stephen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bob f it 20:48, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning for editing Sarah (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 20:49, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini hablame aqui 20:52, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Girl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Girl, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Sweet sixteen (birthday), even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 20:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Indianapolis Colts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hut 8.5 20:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Regarding your edits to Djibouti:

Your recent edit to Djibouti (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hunkpapa, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Hunkpapa was changed by 209.2.60.97 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2007-10-25T19:41:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 19:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Note

Per User talk:Daytrivia, I have learned that this IP is shared by multiple computers at a public library. As such, it's probably best that any future blocks be soft blocks; if there's a pattern of similar abuse, a long-term soft block may be appropriate. Mangojuicetalk 18:39, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I don't see any bad contributions by this IP, so what gives? Should everyone using a shared IP suffer because of one incident?"

Decline reason: "Serious abuse from this IP address. I've reduced the block length to one month from when I originally blocked but that is the most I am willing to do at this time. --Deskana (talk) 18:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I'm talking to Deskana now. Kwsn (Ni!) 18:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Super Saiyan, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to War on Drugs‎ . Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kuru talk 17:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Northern Foods, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Northern Foods was changed by 209.2.60.97 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-24T17:51:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Concentration has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Culture of Japan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Lipa Schmeltzer do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.