User talk:209.152.67.222

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] April 2005

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

Pavel Vozenilek 22:45, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pavel Vozenilek 22:06, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

Your change to the page Yesterday was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. -- Whpq 17:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Paris, Texas on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Will (aka Wimt) 19:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hawaii. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hawaii, you will be blocked from editing. --Diniz (talk) 17:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your final warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hawaii, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Sweatshop, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 19:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Keith Urban, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Keith Urban was changed by 209.152.67.222 (c) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2007-12-13T16:19:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Indira Gandhi, you will be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 15:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Indira Gandhi, you will be blocked from editing. --Jauerback (talk) 15:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Francis Scott Key (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mr. Me Too. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Xy7 (talk) 17:11, 16 January 2008


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mr. Me Too, you will be blocked from editing. — Xy7 (talk) 17:14, 16 January 2008

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dork. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Dork. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - ✰ALLSTAR✰ echo 14:33, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Atom (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 15:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nose has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. StaticGull  Talk  14:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)