User talk:209.136.71.163

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:
This IP address, 209.136.71.163, is registered to Xspedius Communications Co. ESPIRE-4BL (NET-209-136-0-0-1) 
                                 209.136.0.0 - 209.136.255.255

Cameron Communications CAMERO-200410291529673 (NET-209-136-71-0-1)

                                 209.136.71.0 - 209.136.71.255. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts should be made to contact Xspedius Communications Co. ESPIRE-4BL (NET-209-136-0-0-1) 
                                 209.136.0.0 - 209.136.255.255

Cameron Communications CAMERO-200410291529673 (NET-209-136-71-0-1)

                                 209.136.71.0 - 209.136.71.255 to report abuse, which can be done here. Contact information can be viewed in the WHOIS report.
If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it is possible for the owner of the IP, Xspedius Communications Co. ESPIRE-4BL (NET-209-136-0-0-1) 
                                 209.136.0.0 - 209.136.255.255

Cameron Communications CAMERO-200410291529673 (NET-209-136-71-0-1)

                                 209.136.71.0 - 209.136.71.255, to determine who was making contributions from this address at a given time.
If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).


O worthy editor! Please indicate the specific changes you would like to see to the Anna Anderson article either here or on the discussion page and either I or another user (probably Milton) will seek administrator help to revise the article with NPOV.--Markisgreen 04:52, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you haven't made edits to Anna Anderson or are not interested in doing so, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant messages.--Markisgreen 15:35, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh smartass, get your head out of your ass because you aren't doing anything to help solve anything. You like the article just how it is because it supports your agenda.

Contents

[edit] no agenda regarding this topic, my agenda is encyclopedic

FYI, I have zero interest in Anna Anderson or Anastasia or the public perceptions of either one of them. I do have an interest in wikipedia being an encyclopedia that is comprehensive and complete without being a collection of rants.--Markisgreen 12:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Nope. Otherwise you'd represent eye-witnesses from both sides.

[edit] Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia

Your edits have been reverted. All respected texts list her death as 1918 and your removal of external links, including the Search Foundation link, are not helpful. --Bookworm857158367 12:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

The latest World Encyclopedia (2002) lists Anastasia as 1901-? But that really dosen't bother me. But honestly, what reason should the Search homepage be on the Anastasia page? Are we gonna keep it there 100 years from now when they are still looking? Maybe the link should be added when they actually make some kind of progress.

First of all, if you're going to edit, it would be nice if you'd register and have a formal user name. Secondly, all pages and references that are relevant to Grand Duchess Anastasia and her legend belong in that article, including the Search Foundation page and the information about the Bulgarian village, and Anna Anderson and the arguments for and against her survival. To be fair and balanced, both sides need to be represented. Your edits (and those who claim that she is DEAD, DEAD, DEAD and died for sure in 1918 and all claims to the contrary should be taken out of the article) attempt to tip the balance to one side or the other. That article was peer-reviewed as it is and was named a featured article. I tried mighty hard to reference every claim and to make it fair. Leave it alone unless you can cite a reference or have something new to add and can treat the material in a balanced fashion, presenting both sides. The point is that nobody really knows what happened. --Bookworm857158367 14:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

You're right bookworm. Maybe you should also do something to make the ANNA ANDERSON page more balanced.

[edit] Anna Anderson

As unfair as it may be, registered user accounts receive more weight than IP addresses, like your own. I would suggest that if you want to have more weight with the article, you would do well to register an account. --Milton 21:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Trusilver, you will be blocked from editing. Vandalizing talk pages is the same as vandalizing article. You want to play this game, we will play this game. I suggest you deal with whatever issues you have and get down to business though. If you aren't interested in helping the rest of the editors of Anna Anderson to make a fair and balanced article, maybe you need to consider sitting this one out. good day. Trusilver 08:12, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Trusilver, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 15:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


This is a warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to wikipedia page Anna Anderson, you will place yourself in a position where you may be blocked from editing wikipedia. The discussion page on Anna Anderson is where you should bring up any objections. The Anna Anderson wikipedia page has been recently the subject of extensive discussions on the issue. I suggest you read them before vandalising the article once again. Finneganw 10:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anna Anderson

Take a look at the article's talk page for my explanation about how I am editing this article. More still needs to be done, but your edits really didn't help at this point. I also suggest that you register if you're going to keep editing. Anonymous editors don't have as much weight as registered editors. --Bookworm857158367 12:29, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Please stop removing information from this article. Take it to the talk page and we can discuss whatever changes you want made. I've requested that this page be semi-protected to keep anonymous editors from editing it for the time being. You really should register. --Bookworm857158367 12:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
Please discuss the changes you want made on the talk page. The edits you continue to make are not helpful here. Some of the additons you made are grammatically incorrect or are spelling errors. "Experiment" is correct, not "expiriment," for instance. Some of your sentence structure is also problematic. Please register. --Bookworm857158367 15:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please do not remove external links from the Anna Anderson article. I have reverted your changes. --Bookworm857158367 13:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

This is a warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did when removing information from the wikipedia page Anna Anderson, you will place yourself in a position where you may be blocked from editing wikipedia. The discussion page on Anna Anderson is where you should bring up any objections. The Anna Anderson wikipedia page has been recently the subject of extensive discussions on the issue. I suggest you read them before vandalising the article once again. Finneganw 06:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you have done to Anna Anderson by repeatedly removing external links, you will be blocked from editing. It should be noted that you have disregarded previous warnings given by Bookworm857158367 on 4 September 2007 and myself on 5 September 2007. Your vandalism has been reverted. The Anna Anderson wikipedia page has been the subject of extensive discussions. I suggest you read them before attempting to vandalise the article again. Finneganw 13:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Your continued vandalism of the Anna Anderson page has been duly noted. You are likely to be blocked as a consequence of failing to take heed of repeated warnings against violating clearing specified wikipedia regulations. Finneganw 01:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

I have blocked this IP for 24 hours due to disruptive editing and revert warring. When you come off the block, please use the talkpage to facilitate discussion. Best, ~ Riana ⁂ 03:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)