User talk:207.81.56.49

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have attempted to find a solution to the issues at Regina Neighbourhoods in Talk: Regina Neighbourhoods only to have my comments deleted by User: Mumun Man. I have also made several requests for mediation and have not had any success. Could someone objective please help me with this issue, as several editors at Regina Neighbourhoods are attempting to shut out any item that does not fit their POV.--207.81.56.49 20:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

I have been blocked for no apparent reason beyond subjective opinion. Could someone please help me and/or explain to me the reasoning behind this block. I sat out the edit war block and never attempted another edit but did attempt to find a solution to the war by combining two sets of stats at Talk: Regina Neighbourhoods. Thanks in advance.--207.81.56.49 19:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

You are were blocked as a block evading sock puppet, that is why you are blocked. -- John Reaves (talk) 22:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, typo. -- John Reaves (talk) 22:44, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] I'll help

Give me a full explanation beneath my comment of what is going on and I'll happily mediate your problems.--Manboobies 19:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

"Ryulong (Talk | contribs) blocked "207.81.56.49 (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 72 hours (Block evasion by User;Mayor Quimby) "

BTW, your block is only 72 hours? You could wait it out and mediate it after?--Manboobies 20:00, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

It is for no reason beyond speculation. I had an edit war block, which is fine and I sat it out. Only to be blocked within hours of it being over for no reason beyond someone said I was a sock puppet of previous user. From reading the comments, it seems this user lives in another province from me, some 1500 km away. How is it possible for people to block users for no reason ? Is this not an abuse of admin powers ? Is there not a requirement for proof beyond subjective comments ? I am looking for some fairness, that is all.--207.81.56.49 21:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rationale for block and/or labelling as a puppet

I have not been giving an rationale evidence or anything resembling fair or logical thought for my block. You have labeled me a puppet without any discussion or hard evidence, all of it has been circumstantial. I was blocked for edit warring then without any provocation, after being promised mediation, I was blocked again. I never edited any articles nor participated in any wars. I actually attempt to find a compromise for the second time. Please provide me with any evidence that you may have, so I may defend myself. There is some sort of higher level of appeal beyond some admin that for all purposes is more anonymous then an IP. My hope is that there exist a member ,or members, that are able to see the unethical treatment of myself and help guide me through the process. Instead, at this point, I feel like I have been forced to wear a pink triangle on my clothing so everyone knows what I am, without any true proof of the fact. I hope, I am wrong.--207.81.56.49 16:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "What policy have I broken ? and How may I escalate this for further review ?"

Decline reason: "You're very obviously related, either as a meat or sockpuppet -- please see WP:SOCK. – Luna Santin (talk) 08:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • I've posted a request on WP:ANI for another admin to come and review your block - Alison ☺ 05:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Thank you, I sat out the first block and never editted anything. I actually posted a possible compromise at Talk: Regina Neighbourhoods in hopes of an agreement.--207.81.56.49 05:55, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not Mayor Quimby, this is not justified. I have attempted to find two solutions to the edit war. Please unblock."

Decline reason: "As previously stated, you need to sit out this block. Please stop abusing the unblock review process or your page will end up protected against editing — Alison ☺ 04:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


This user's request to have the autoblock on his/her IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

Edit warring on Regina neighbourhoods

  • Decline reason:

You have not been autoblocked. However, you have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock|your_reason_here}} to your talk page. -- —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate all constructive edits in our articles. Be sure to use the Edit summary box to explain any edits you make. This helps remove any chance of other editors thinking you are making biased edits. --Kmsiever 17:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll attempt to meet your strigent standards.--207.81.56.49 18:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello 207.81.56.49! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. May I also give you a mild warning by simply stating that editors who are interested in raising the profile of Regina neighbourhoods on Wikipedia have discussed the fact that the statistics pushed by the legal-threat making banned editor Mayor Quimby are false and that the continual reinsertion of said statistics is vandalism. Sorry to be so direct! Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Mumun 無文 20:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] Blocked

You've been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring on Regina neighbourhoods. – Steel 00:53, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Munmum Man and Kmsiever are the culprits, I am attempting to keep the articles integrity and have reported them for vandalism.--207.81.56.49 00:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "User: Mumun Man and User: Kmsiever are the edit war culprits and I attempted to report them more then once. I was also looking for some mediation in the matter, as User: Mumun Man has claimed legitimate statistics are false. If I am to be blocked then these two should have to face similar fates but all I want is to be unblocked and the dispute mediated, not accelerated"

Decline reason: "Regardless of the content dispute, not vandalism, that was under way you broke the three-revert rule, and for this reason your unblock request is denied. — Steve (Stephen) talk 05:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I wasn't blocked for 3RR; It was edit warring, which was also particpated by the previously posted users. User: Mumun Man has now placed personal attacks on his user page referring to me as a sock puppet. Why can I not get a mediation on these changes ?"

Decline reason: "3RR is a rule about edit warring. You can have mediation on the changes, but you'll have to sit the block out first. JPD (talk) 14:42, 25 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

--207.81.56.49 14:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

This is not your talk page. If you continue to post {{unblock}} templates here, this talk page will become protected to prevent abuse. 68.5.224.107 16:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Who's talk page is it then ?--207.81.56.49 17:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The "owner" of the database on which this talk page is located is the Wikimedia Foundation. But that's irrelevant; repeated unblock requests can be considered disruptive, and can result in semi-protection of this talk page. My suggestion is to try methods of dispute resolution, rather than of escalation, once the block is over. GracenotesT § 17:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I have to no avail. It was promised to me previously instead I get blocked for no reason, none.--207.81.56.49 23:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] First, register, plz

First, register, second, check WP:V and WP:RS.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)