User talk:207.74.196.20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 207.74.196.20, is registered to Detroit Public Library, and may be shared by multiple users. In the case of organizations using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
Please notice that blanking this page will not remove any blocks in effect.
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Contents

[edit] April 2006

Hi - I've reverted your change to the cannabis article as I feel it was neither impartial or beneficial to the article. T. J. Day 23:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Self-defense

Your recent edit to Self-defense was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 17:40, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bow Wow, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Yamla 20:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove referenced material from articles. If you would like to add information, please cite a reliable source. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wafulz 16:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove content from pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RexNL 17:41, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Retcon. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 16:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Retcon. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rama's arrow 16:42, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Legal threat

Regarding your legal threat here: You have now been blocked for one month as per WP:NLT. --InShaneee 19:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Shadow the Hedgehog

Hi. I've reverted your edit to Shadow the Hedgehog, since it added several incorrect external links, removed headers, and also seemed to remove other information. If there are some corrections you made that got removed also, feel free to add them again, but please don't make the changes I listed above without at least providing a good edit summary, or preferably discussing them on the talk page. Thanks, and happy editing. --Sopoforic 17:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Please don't revert without discussing the changes first. Some of the changes you're making seem reasonable, but others are certainly bad, such as removing the section headings and adding the external links. You may contact me directly on my talk page if you like, but please do so before reverting these changes. --Sopoforic 18:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

I've started a discussion on the talk page of Shadow the Hedgehog to determine what we should do. Please participate in the discussion. --Sopoforic 18:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Doctor Eggman page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. LibLord 17:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Dr. Robotnik (other media), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. LibLord 18:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Shadow the Hedgehog, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --.ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.( talk | contrib) 20:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

{{subst:test2} --Spixels 18:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Eggman

Please stop vandalizing the Dr. Eggman page. It is fact that his real name is unknown, as stated in the Japanese Sonic site. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.227.1.55 (talk) 23:36, 13 February 2007 (UTC).

Please, just stop it. If you have ANY evidence that suggests that his "real name" is Ivo Robotnik, then please post it here. Otherwise, stop vandalising.63.227.1.55 06:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Ogden Nash, you will be blocked.--Diniz 20:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Ogden Nash, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. RHB Talk - Edits 20:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Look, if you can convince me that "Ivo Robotnik" is still Eggman's real name, then please do so. Otherwise, stop stating false facts. His name is Eggman now, NOT Ivo Robotnik. If you continue to put false facts on the article, then I'll have no choice but to ban you.207.224.61.246 00:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

In the Sonic Wildfire/Secret Rings comic, it calls him Ivo "Eggman" Robotnik. When the part of the name is not quoted, then that part is his real name. Case closed!!!!!!!207.74.196.20 17:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Def Jam Vendetta

I guess, the problem is solved. R@y 08:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Where are you getting this from?

Excuse me 207.74.196.20, but where are you getting the information for your recent edits to sonic character articles? They have been quite suspicious, which is why I have already reverted some of them. Please respond, either here or at my talk page. Thanks. --LuigiManiac | Talk 18:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm seconding this - I haven't seen anything from Sega that would suggest some of the edits you're making. — BrotherFlounder 18:26, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I've probably broken the 3 Revert Rule (which I just now remembered about) on 2 or 3 Sonic character articles trying to undo your edits, which I have noticed in several cases is just wrong. Please respond to these messages so we can sort something out, preferably before you go off editing another article. Thank you. --LuigiManiac | Talk 18:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ada King, Countess of Lovelace

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Ada King, Countess of Lovelace. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. > Kamope < 20:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reply to your comment on my talk page

I saw Talk:Sonic the Hedgehog (character) already. I'm okay with it. I'm not going to participate in this edit war that seems to be going around the sonic character articles for now. I will revert clear-cut vandalism from them still, but I don't want to get caught in the middle of this edit war again. --LuigiManiac | Talk 17:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Snively Kintobor

Thanks for experimenting with the page Snively Kintobor on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added obviously incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in our encyclopedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --LuigiManiac | Talk 18:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop reverting articles without any sort of reason or purpose

Please stop reverting articles without any sort of reason or purpose. It's annoying. Nemu 16:05, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --LuigiManiac 02:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] How do I know?

How do I know his physical age is 15? First it's been thrown in my face here, and he shares way too many similarities to Sonic. His voice even sounds like Sonic's, just in a tough guy way. 207.74.196.20 15:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I certainly didn't throw it in anyone's face. That's the fault of IGN and their ignorance. His voice only sounds like Sonic's because his actor voices both of them and sucks at it. Sonic and Shadow sounded nothing alike when Drummond and Humphrey were in control. Anywho, you've got no source for that so I'm gonna have to revert it. Besides, I'd say he's at least 21 :P

Oh..and do yourself a favor and register a username or something XDGrandMasterGalvatron 15:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sonic the Hedgehog CD, you will be blocked from editing. Warrush 17:55, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:John Green (fan), you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Sunshine Man 17:06, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Final Fantasy VI, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Sunshine Man 18:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Final Fantasy (series), you will be blocked from editing. Kariteh 19:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sonic 3D. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Miremare 03:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] An enquiry

Considering you also make constructive edits, it is puzzling why you persist in removing every reference to "Sega Mega Drive" and every {{fact}} or {{unsourced}} tag you come across. The usage of "Mega Drive" has been covered here as I'm very sure you're aware, and fact tags are placed in Wikipedia articles to help in their progress by indicating needed references. As you can imagine I can do without reverting these in every article you edit, so please stop doing it, and remember that if you persist with this you will be blocked from editing, as you have already been warned on many, many occasions. Thank you, Miremare 18:55, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 9 July 2007

I've reverted all the edits you've made so far today that were disruptive. If you wish to continue editing Wikipedia I suggest you take heed of the advice I've left above, and also complete the edit summary every time you make an edit. I think I've wasted enough time reverting stuff you've done and will nominate you to be banned the next time I see a disruptive edit from you. This would be a shame as you clearly also make some constructive edits, so please consider it. Miremare 18:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 11 July 2007

Since I'm pretty sure from your user contributions page that someone else got that last message, I'll remind you again to please take heed of the above two posts. Thank you, Miremare 19:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 12 July 2007

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Miremare 18:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Criticism of Family Guy. Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not delete maintenance templates (such as {{Citation needed}}; they are needed to maintain quality standards on Wikipedia. edgarde 21:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 17 July 2007

Hello again. Following the expiry of your block, today you removed the following:

The last two of these were specifically marked with "<!---Do not remove prior to discussion taking place on talk page of Pacers-Pistons brawl.(!)--->". You NEED to stop doing this or you will end up getting yourself blocked indefinitely. I've done my best to try to help you but I'm tired of it now. ONE further instance of this kind of vandalism, and you will be reported for blocking immediately. Miremare 19:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of one week for removing maintenance tags from articles without any edits or consensus. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Daniel Case 19:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 23 July 2007

This is your only warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. // Senthryl 17:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3 August 2007

Are you aware of why you were blocked the last two times? It was because you keep removing {{fact}}, {{trivia}}, {{mergeto}} and {{mergefrom}} from every article you edit without addressing the concerns they raise, which is unacceptable. If you do it again, I will have you blocked again and it will likely be for much longer. Miremare 14:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for one month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.one monthAnthony.bradbury"talk" 22:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sep 10

Don't remove maintenence templates like you did here: [1]. You're going the right way towards an indefinite block. Miremare 18:46, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 year as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Don't say you weren't warned. Miremare 19:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)