User talk:207.69.139.146

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please consider enhancing your Wikipedia experience by getting an account. It takes less than a minute and will allow you to track the articles most important to you with far greater ease, as well as letting you take advantage of other useful features.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Guadalcanal Province. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Dakota ~ ° 01:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Granite City, Illinois. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! --Llort 01:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Code talker, you will be blocked from editing. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) 03:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. - Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 06:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] September 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Foggy Bottom on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dean Wormer 01:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Asian American. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —— Ryan (t)•(c)•(review me!) 07:47, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Good Burger, you will be blocked from editing. Brianga (talk) 01:16, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Zhihua Si Temple

Thank you for adding a photo to Zhihua Si Temple. Badagnani (talk) 21:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Gaydar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 03:30, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Upper class (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Upper class (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dr Pepper, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dr Pepper was changed by 207.69.139.146 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-24T05:50:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:50, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Angkor has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 03:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC

[edit] May 2008

Hello imbecile, if you are not able to read and comprehend you should not "contribute" to Wikipedia by deleting content.

[edit] Your recent edits at Jin Jing

Could you please stop removing content from articles? There are citations, and you can easily check that the statements are in the cited articles, here the LA Times article. Should I see that you continue to remove content you will face the risk of being blocked for vandalism. Novidmarana (talk) 00:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Given your edit history of vandalism it would be better if you would leave Wikipedia alone as you are clearly not able to contribute in a meaningful way. Heck, you are not even able to read sources on our own and need someone to read it to you aloud. What a great qualification. Novidmarana (talk) 00:54, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Could you please follow the consensus that has been established on talk pages. And read Wikipedia policies, like for example WP:AWW. And no, I am not going to read it out to you again, as that is your responsibility if you want to contribute in a meaningful way (though given all the vandalism originating from your ip address that is very doubtful). Novidmarana (talk) 01:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Eel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Useight (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)