User talk:207.38.206.178

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia that anyone can edit! It seems you have found that out on the Conservation of mass article, thanks for experimenting. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by another user. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Wikipedia loves newcomers and hope you help us make this encyclopedia even better. Thanks! - Akamad 22:32, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball was changed by 207.38.206.178 (u) (t) deleting 7567 characters on 2008-06-02T03:37:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Boccobrock•T 03:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to List of extraterrestrials in Dragon Ball‎ . If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:40, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:41, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

I am not vandalizing. Information has recently been removed from an important canon character. By re-adding that information, I am not vandalizing. In any case, I have merely added the image that was with the profile. That much should at least remain. 207.38.206.178 (talk) 03:44, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding removal of "Burdock"

You removed the information about Burdock, and although there has been some discussion, I'd hardly call it consensus, as the proposals to remove such characters has only been by 72.229.48.178. If you can find anyone else who agrees with the removal then please make note on Talk:List of Saiyans in Dragon Ball. I admit I do not know little about the subject, but don't be removing entire sections of pages without a concensus to point at. Cheers! Boccobrock•T 03:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Actually, TTN pointed out in the same talk page that characters who appear in movies should not be included in general. Bardock is only in 1 movie, that is all. He is highly inconsequential, following the consensus of bulletproof and TTN and Sesshomaru, and others who have previously mentioned that only people who play a major role should be kept. Seriously...I removed minor characters. Highly inconsequential and minor. I didn't remove Goku or Vegeta. I removed Bardock and Broly because they are both inconsequential and are less important than people who have already been removed following this exact same consensus. 207.38.206.178 (talk) 03:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] accusation

i would like to point out that i am a bit offended that i was just accused of "sockpuppetry". all i did was add info that was just removed from a profile...and remove from another profile after checking some talk pages that the information on that page seemed to fall under inconsequential or whatever the nature of those characters might be considered. in what way was that sockpuppetry...? also, on TTN's talk page, other users said that i am obsessed with zarbon. i don't understand why they would be so quick to make that judgment. i have many favorite characters, of which zarbon happens to be one. 207.38.206.178 (talk) 04:24, 2 June 2008 (UTC)