User talk:207.181.15.218

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Walking with Cavemen. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Response

I'm sorry you feel that way. I am not attempting to vandalise so much as offer criticism which obviously is not welcome. The truth is this "documentary" is no more a documentary than Mel Gibson's film "The Patriot" was a documentary of The Revolutionary War and I would like that to be said.

The most recent evidence on australopithecus points to a gorilla-like creature with a gorilla jaw. Anatomists have long known the southern ape to be physically unable to walk upright yet this film ignores evidence to the contrary (hence the phrase "cherry-picked"). Uncritical viewers of this "fictumentary" might actually think anthropologists have determined the portrayed behavior, cast upon a creature no one has seen, with certainty.

[edit] Response

If you are to make those claims you MUST provide referenced evidence in support of your criticism and you must learn how to modify wikipedia properly and put it in without hugely modifying the page. Thegreyanomaly 22:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Walking with Cavemen, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. YourEyesOnly 06:39, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi there; I note your changes to the hominid article. May I suggest that, in a case such as this where there is a clear disagreement as to factuality, that you take your discussion to the talk page of the article, attempt to reach agreemenht, and come back to WP:DR if this is not possible. Bickering on the article page will just get every contributing editor blocked, which I think none of us really want.--Anthony.bradbury 22:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Stop Vandalizing

You have been warned atleast three times (though without use of official template), and hence I may do this

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Walking with Cavemen, you will be blocked from editing. Thegreyanomaly 02:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Its one thing to modify criticism into a page (assuming it is cited and/or verified, which yours has not been), but its another to completely revert a page to put in that criticism. You must cite any criticism and you must make sure it is a valid scientific opinion in the case of paleo documentaries such Walking with Cavemen. Thegreyanomaly 02:17, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

I also use this ip, and have never edited that article. If I create an account, will I still be banned?


If this IP is banned from editing, you will be banned from editing. However, if you create a username, you should be fine.-Ssault 03:09, 5 May 2007 (UTC)