User talk:207.170.238.132

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Christian F. Schilt worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Maralia (talk) 21:23, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Idaho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AlexiusHoratius (talk) 18:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Medieval art, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Medieval art was changed by 207.170.238.132 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-02-21T19:31:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Medieval art constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 19:34, 21 February 2008 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Medieval art, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Will (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey seems youve been targeting a page for vandalism on 'medival art' Not really cool...how about making some constructive edits? Take care and have a great day Ottawa4ever (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Battle of Thermopylae (480 BC) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jail. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 16:32, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to United States Marine Corps. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Cyrus Andiron 16:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Isoroku Yamamoto. Your edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do us a favor and teleport somewhere else. Trekphiler (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kylie Minogue. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. -MBK004 15:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Independence Day (United States) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. SharkfaceT/C 23:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jessica Williams has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 19:25, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rhinoceros, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rhinoceros was changed by 207.170.238.132 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-08T17:44:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Rhinoceros constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Seraphim♥Whipp 17:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC))

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 22:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ares has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Cerberus constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 18:25, 22 May 2008 (UTC))

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to SNCC, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: SNCC was changed by 207.170.238.132 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-28T15:39:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:39, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Camel (cigarette) constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. FelisLeoTalk! 18:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Halo, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Halo was changed by 207.170.238.132 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-28T18:25:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:25, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Duh. Antonio Lopez (talk) 19:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Rossami (talk) 20:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reasons for insubordination

This user number is used for an entire school district. In other words, there are 2,000 people and around 200 computers with this number. It is sad how some students have used Wikipedia, but banning the productive ones from editing and contributing is not right. Though the bad edits are a detriment to Wikipedia, it is only one students making one edit. There has rarely been anything unproductive under this number. On these computers, you cannot register a username. Sorry for your predicament, but the banning is annoying. 207.170.238.132 (talk) 21:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)