User talk:207.137.79.253

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 207.137.79.253, is registered to Bishops School and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.- Gilliam 19:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] 9th April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Zimbabwe. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gilawson 17:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Excretory system, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 19:45, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Exon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:15, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jacob kelly, you will be blocked from editing. --Finngall talk 18:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Common Seal, you will be blocked from editing. - Gilliam 19:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gottfried Leibniz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 21:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gottfried Leibniz. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 21:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gottfried Leibniz, you will be blocked from editing. SJP 21:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Nun's Priest's Tale, you will be blocked from editing. Anarchia 19:56, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] AfD nomination of The Society of the Perfect Right Triangle

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Society of the Perfect Right Triangle, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Society of the Perfect Right Triangle. Thank you. Anarchia 05:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Froot Loops, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Froot Loops was changed by 207.137.79.253 (c) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-01-09T20:03:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Froot Loops. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Crazy Boris with a red beard (talk) 20:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Froot Loops, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:08, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Puerto Rico. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Hispaniola. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 17:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Phat, you will be blocked from editing. — Xy7 (talk) 19:38, 14 January 2008

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Razorflame (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lightning, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lightning was changed by 207.137.79.253 (u) (t) deleting 17983 characters on 2008-02-07T20:54:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Lightning (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Shabbat (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to David Durenberger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: David Durenberger was changed by 207.137.79.253 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2008-02-15T20:06:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to The Bishop's School (La Jolla, California) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 18:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Hinny has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 17:23, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Hinny constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 17:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Aphex Twin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Kaini (talk) 19:36, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Cruelty to animals, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Puchiko (Talk-email) 17:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Kenyon Martin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Q T C 18:12, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Your recent edit to Leviticus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 19:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)