User talk:206.57.121.14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -N 01:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during June 14, 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:30, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Deleting a cite

You seem to have a problem with an citation at International Republican Institute - you've deleted it at least twice. If you don't explain why in an edit summary or on the article's talk page, I'm going have to consider this vandalism, and start issuing warnings. John Broughton | Talk 22:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


Please do not remove content from Wikipedia
You have recently removed content from Wikipedia without reason, after having already been warned about such behaviour. Please stop now, as further vandalism may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are still welcome to (and encouraged to) carry out constructive edits on Wikipedia articles.

John Broughton | Talk 19:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

What is it with your deletions of large parts of this article. You seem to be a constructive editor elsewhere; I just don't get it. -- John Broughton (☎☎) 20:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to International Republican Institute, you will be blocked. Fireice 21:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Final warning

This is your only warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to International Republican Institute, you will be blocked from editing. If you have valid objections to text in this article, you must explain those, on the Talk:International Republican Institute page, or your deletion will be considered vandalism. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 18:02, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Shared IP address

Thank you for the informative posting at my user talk page, that this IP address is shared by all of the entire organization (the International Republican Institute). As for your suggestion, unfortunately it's impossible, with the software that runs Wikipedia, to restrict (with technical means, as opposed to human) an editor/IP address from editing only certain things. Either an editor can edit everything (except protected pages), or he/she is blocked and can edit only his/her user talk page; there is nothing inbetween.

If the deletion of content were more frequent, I'd recommend that anyone wanting to edit from this IP address get a registered account (see Wikipedia:Why create an account?), and then to try to get the entire IP address/account blocked entirely. But because this has been an infrequent problem, I'll probably just revert the deletions whenever I notice them, and not post further warnings. I do note that other editors may feel differently. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 19:56, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to International Republican Institute, you will be blocked from editing. Looking back over the page history I note that you have made over 25 edits which have been classed as vandalism for deleting content. Please stop. Avnjay 20:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to International Republican Institute, you will be blocked from editing. Saganaki- 00:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Conflict of interest advice

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
    and you must always:
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Addhoc 17:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Kappa Alpha Order has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 18:32, 23 May 2008 (UTC)