User talk:206.28.153.114

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Kim Kardashian. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Noah 18:47, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] January 2008

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to FutureKids, Inc, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 03:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Ohmpandya We need to talk... ♦ contribs 03:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Re: Affinion Group

It appears that someone else has removed the information already. Also, just so you know, under normal circumstances, because that statement had a reference to a reliable source, the info should have been left in. However, in this case, the reference pointed to an HTTP 404 Not Found page and thus could not be verified and it was ok to remove the info. When editing Wikipedia, you should always have a reference for ANY controversial or derogatory data you want to include and if any information, even information that derides someone or something, has a reference, it should not be removed if the reference exists and is reliable. Anyway, as I said before, the info was not verifiable and it is ok to reremove it if it gets restored. If you do remove the information if someone readds it, I would recommend leaving an edit summary that explains why the info can't be included (namely, the referenced article doesn't exist). Also, if you are planning on editing Wikipedia in the future, I strongly recommend that you create an account because it helps people keep track of you on Wikipedia better and offers several advantages. (also, the only information required of you is an email address, so you don't have to tell anyone who you are in real life if you don't want to. *cue evil laugh* ;) ) Regards. Thingg⊕⊗ 21:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)