User talk:205.219.133.241

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This message is regarding Gold farmer. While the statement that they are mostly Chinese is a popular stereotype amongst MMORPG players, the statement has not been verified, and probably can't be. Please stop re-adding that statement to the article, as it is not what we at Wikipedia consider a Neutral point of view. Mo0[talk] 19:41, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop modifying the article Gold farmer in the manner that you have been. As the article is currently written, it mentions the stereotype but does not endorse it. Again, this complies with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, whereas removing the OTHER stereotype (Mexican gold farmer) and stating it as a fact at the top of the article is decidedly not neutral. Your additions have been undone multiple times by 3 different editors. You can present a case for why it isn't neutral at its talk page, but until then please stop reverting the article, as you have gone well over the three revert limit and have caused two editors to reach that limit also. Mo0[talk] 22:04, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

You're missing the point now. It's admirable that you're trying to make the article neutral, but you're going about it in the wrong way. The difference between what you were originally doing and what you're doing now is that before, you were implying a stereotype was a fact, whereas now you're modifying the statement of the stereotype. The issue is that it is factual that there is a stereotype that most gold farmers are Chinese or Mexican, but the stereotype itself is not verifiable. I appreciate your efforts, but you're attacking from the wrong angles. Mo0[talk] 22:55, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- pgk(talk) 20:35, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Blocked for 24 hours

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism, for a period of 24 hours.
If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires.

--FireFox 20:46, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.--Shanel 07:03, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] February 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Sango123 (talk) 21:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 13, 2006

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Saravask 00:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Maglite, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In the future, please do not experiment on article pages; instead, use the sandbox. Thank you. --RedHillian (talk) 22:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Petitcodiac River, you will be blocked from editing. —ThreeDee912 (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Petitcodiac River, you will be blocked from editing. —ThreeDee912 (talk) 03:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Bhavesh. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Grblundell (talk) 11:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lunatic, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lunatic was changed by 205.219.133.241 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-03-16T03:43:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 03:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Aga Muhlach has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 07:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Aga Muhlach constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 07:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC))

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Sitel has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prashanthns (talk) 00:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Sadomasochism.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. HalJor (talk) 04:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to December 20 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. J.delanoygabsadds 19:20, 30 May 2008 (UTC)