User talk:205.145.64.64

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Want Proof?

"Alleged" can be proven. It wasn't vandalism by any stretch.

(cur) (last) 12:58, 14 June 2007 205.145.64.64 (Talk) (989 bytes) (removed "Personal Life" section, which alleged that Guillory was a "deadbeat dad")

[edit] Your edit to Shield bug

Your recent edit to Shield bug (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

  1. Thank you for experimenting with the page Arts and entertainment in India on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. A. B. (talk) 19:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Artaxiad 22:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Tom DeLay

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Tom DeLay, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. --EarthPerson 15:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tramadol, you will be blocked from editing. Hanoi Girl 18:51, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Troy, Ohio, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Steven Weston 12:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Charles Dickens, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Charles Dickens was changed by 205.145.64.64 (c) (t) replacing content with 'charles dickens sucks!!!' on 2007-08-17T16:04:54+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 20:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Charles Dickens, you will be blocked from editing. — TKD::Talk 20:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Ludlum, you will be blocked from editing. Trusilver 15:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Groupthink. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 23:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Basketball. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matthew Brandon Yeager 21:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Aníbal Acevedo Vilá. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Queerbubbles | Leave me Some Love

[edit] April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Ana Isabelle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 17:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Konami Code, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Click23 (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2008 (UTC)