User talk:204.186.233.202

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This user has repeatedly vandalized articles, with the clearest intention of being destructive. Many of their edits, however, have not resulted in warnings or blocks. Further abuse from this IP should result in an immediate block without further warning.

This message is regarding the page Regensburg. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:16, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Jefferson. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. PJM 19:18, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- Vary | Talk 18:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. -- Vary | Talk 18:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Timeline of communication technology. This is your last warning. The next time you blank a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Computerjoe's talk 18:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Spanish poetry, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Krich (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2005

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Chipmunk, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --JerryOrr 17:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Gladiator was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 18:08, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Mexico on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dlohcierekim 18:06, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Mexico. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dlohcierekim 18:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to The Used, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --David.Mestel 16:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:09, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 12:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ludwig van Beethoven

Your recent edit to Ludwig van Beethoven was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:32, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Ludwig van Beethoven. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. AvB ÷ talk 13:22, 2 June 2006 (UTC)