User talk:204.126.132.34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 204.126.132.34, is registered to Howard Community College and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. If the institution uses proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may be blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address, 204.126.132.34, is registered to Howard Community College, Columbia, Maryland and may be shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. Attempts to vandalize using this address will be reported to Howard Community College, Columbia, Maryland as network abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. For one thing, if you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 23:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your disruptive edits to Wikipedia

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] September 2005

Regarding this edit: Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hall Monitor 16:52, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] December 2005

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Flakeloaf 20:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] February 2006

  1. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Ashenai 14:47, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2006

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Arniep 10:00, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. — Deckiller 02:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] April 2006

  1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do. --TeaDrinker 23:33, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

  1. Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bill 18:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] June 2006

  1. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to South Pole. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Loudsox 16:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to South Pole, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Loudsox 16:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 2006

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Computer and video games, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TBCTaLk?!? 17:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September 2006

  1. Your recent edit to Category:Christian Right (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 22:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

  1. Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hut 8.5 19:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  2. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Province of Maryland. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- lucasbfr talk 17:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Social change, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- lucasbfr talk 17:34, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning.
    The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Province of Maryland, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Patstuart 17:39, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2006

  1. Your recent edit to Zac Efron (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] March 2007

  1. Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Email spam. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Raymond Arritt 14:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
  2. Your recent edit to Ulyanovskaya Mine disaster (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Knowledge worker, you will be blocked from editing. andy 17:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Elkridge, Maryland, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 17:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

  1. This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Goldman Sachs, you will be blocked from editing. AgentCDE / Talk / 18:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Royal Alexandra Theatre. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Triple H‎, you will be blocked from editing. —LOL 23:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Genetic engineering. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 14:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Music of SpongeBob SquarePants, you will be blocked from editing. utcursch | talk 14:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
  3. This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
    The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1984, you will be blocked from editing. Oli Filth(talk) 15:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  4. The administrative staff has been notified of your continued vandalism to articles such as Pine Barrens (New Jersey), Tehran, and Glenelg High School. --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 23:49, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Golf course. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 16:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of essayists, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 00:27, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Glenelg Country School has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 16:03, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Ottoman Empire (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 14:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Conservatism in the United States (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Glenelg Country School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 00:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Pre-kindergarten (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 00:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. · AndonicO Hail! 00:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:SiobhanHansa has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Dreadstar † 22:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:SiobhanHansa, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked again

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this IP address will be subject to a longer block.

NawlinWiki (talk) 22:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Economy of Second Life has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 13:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)