User talk:204.122.16.13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Obligations and prod

You misread the diff in the first place; Grye reverted Freimaurer, and I removed the oaths because the article didn't match Sacred Text, so the source was wrong. I want to see a reason for the prod removal before you do it, especially since as far as I'm concerned you're a POV-pusher. MSJapan 23:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Sent to AfD. MSJapan 00:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I reverted your changes to Obligations in Freemasonry. IF you had logged in I might have passed it by, but for an anonymous user to make such a large removal of text without clear support on the Talk page, I had to revert it. --Bill W. Smith, Jr. (talk/contribs) 16:52, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anti-masonry

I have seen no evidence that you are biased against freemasonry, and therefore as a wikipedian and a mason encourage you to keep on contributing and participating. It is very easy to believe that there is a conspiracy against revealing certain texts: in reality this could not be further from the truth.

The recent edits and deletion discussions regarding the obligations are motivated by verifiability issues; that masons are present is inevitable, given the scope of the article.

I do hope that you can reply to me, ideally by my talk page or email, if you have anything to add to this. I do not want you to get the impression that there is some cabal or otherwise preventing encyclopaedic information from reaching Wikipedia. Dave 02:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)