User talk:204.110.225.254

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder was changed by 204.110.225.254 (c) (t) replacing content with 'ADHD is a false diagnosis to try and push a drug which effects can be detremental to a child- namly ridlin. Let boys be boys and girls be girls and children be ch...' on 2007-09-27T15:42:12+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 15:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Vsmith 00:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Wingdings, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Caerwine Caer’s whines 03:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Church of Scientology, you will be blocked from editing. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Church of Scientology. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 23:50, 18 January 2008 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Church of Scientology, you will be blocked from editing. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 23:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 23:54, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


[edit] Michael Medved

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Michael Medved. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Michael Medved. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 18:51, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Second warnings

Do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Michael Medved. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue this type of editing, you can be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Michael Medved, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 16:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FINAL WARNINGS

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Medved, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michael Medved. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Ward3001 (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Michael Medved

I began a discussion on the Talk page regarding use of the term "conservative". Please discuss there and wait for others to contribute before making any additional changes. Otherwise you will be blocked for edit warring. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 22:18, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ward3001 (talk) 22:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked...

...for a day; you may wish to read WP:3RR before you return. Thanks. ➔ REDVEЯS has changed his plea to guilty 23:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Reverting cited information

Do not remove properly sourced information, as you did on Michael Medved. If you start edit warring again, you will be blocked again. That would be the third block, which probably will be for a much longer period of time. Consider this your only warning. Ward3001 (talk) 01:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Liberalism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. de Bivort 17:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Medved, you will be blocked from editing. de Bivort 17:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] FINAL WARNING

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Medved, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 19:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nothing else to do?

And you'll have even less to do after your block, which is coming in a few moments. Ward3001 (talk) 22:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Malinaccier (talk) 22:57, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


Please see Medved's statement: "Cops are good people, it's one of the lessons that I learned many years that helped make me a conservative", from [1] which is cited in the lead. --Slp1 (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Medved, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 23:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Ward3001 (talk) 23:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ChetblongT C 23:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.