User talk:203.97.0.38

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been temporarily semi-protected from editing to prevent disruptive actions.

 Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to prevent 203.97.0.38 (talk • contribs • block logauto) and other new users from making disruptive edits.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.
Attention:

This IP address, 203.97.0.38, is registered to Christ's College, Canterbury, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Contents

March 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Heart. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. AmiDaniel 03:34, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

May 2006

  1. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --TheProject 02:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Elizabeth I of England was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:53, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 21:56, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Please cease from adding comments to pages that people have worked hard on. -- Samir धर्म 08:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to List of child prodigies, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 01:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Guy Fawkes. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. DakPowers (Talk) 21:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Guy Fawkes was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 21:40, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. mgekelly 05:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

June 2006

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Mental retardation, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ucanlookitup 03:43, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

July 2006

I've removed a large number of links to http://www.liturgy.co.nz recently, based on the guidelines found at WP:EL. Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. Luna Santin 11:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

As a general rule, I'm more than happy to discuss my actions, when I can, and when it'll be productive in some way. In this case, I made a judgement call or two. The first link -- to the Hiroshima page -- was what I'd consider unencyclopedic. Many of the other links seemed, to me, gratuitous, in I couldn't find significant, apparent, direct, encyclopedic relevance to the article's subject matter, and also in that the link generally pointed only to the liturgy.co.nz site index (not to any particular article); likewise, the site was added to roughly 30-40 articles, over the course of a few months. Finally, I had a strong impression that you're personally involved in, or otherwise connected with, the liturgy.co.nz website, at which point I should note WP:EL guidelines, which suggest that all of us editors should avoid linking to our own websites (per WP:AUTO). Hope that helps a bit. I'm not one to hold grudges, generally, but it's important for us all to remember that Wikipedia is not a collection of links to every website. Thanks and regards, Luna Santin 06:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

August 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page David Bellamy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. alphaChimp laudare 04:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to St. Catherines Island. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Wikipediarules2221 06:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Mississippi: The Album, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. zappa.jake (talk) 07:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Pregnancy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Maustrauser 11:12, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

September 2006

Your recent edit to Steriogram (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:48, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Steriogram (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

RexNL 21:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Sept. 13/06

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Sulfur dioxide. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -Royalguard11(Talk)(Desk) 01:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Vsmith 01:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Edward VI of England

Your recent edit to Edward VI of England (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 01:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page AC/DC on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 20:42, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Heart. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. FaerieInGrey 20:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to AC/DC. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 01:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tower of London, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 01:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Colditz, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. SkerHawx 01:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of repeated vandalism to Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Bucketsofg 02:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)