User talk:203.91.207.30

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Bangalore, India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.147.178 (talk) 08:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from XHTML. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alf melmac 11:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)


Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Naravorgaara 05:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] March 2007

Hi, the recent edit you made to Category talk:Psychoanalysts has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 14:18, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Sankari. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpuriousQ (talk) 04:39, 14 March 2007 (UTC)


Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Computational complexity theory, even if your ultimate intention is to revert them. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shenme 04:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Help:Editing

Your recent edit to Help:Editing (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 04:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Aspilogia, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KZTalk• Contribs 10:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to maximum transmission unit, you will be blocked from editing. PeteShanosky 15:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Links to your blog posts

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Sarah-Jane Dias. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. utcursch | talk 11:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Rotterdam, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. 144.135.1.196 07:37, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Fr. T.C.Jacob Thalakulam

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Fr. T.C.Jacob Thalakulam, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Kamope (talk) 11:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fr. T.C.Jacob Thalakulam

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Fr. T.C.Jacob Thalakulam, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hersfold (talk/work) 14:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy Deletion tags

Please stop removing speedy deletion tags from various articles without explanation. If you want to protest the speedy tag, please use the {{hangon}} tag to explain why you think the article should remain. Lcarscad 15:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 2007

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hypercube graph. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. —David Eppstein 17:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Kombai, Tamil Nadu (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 06:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to QuickTest Professional. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

-- Ken g6 00:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Saravana, you will be blocked from editing. Anonymous DissidentTalk -- (dated 10:55, 19 June 2007 UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Saravana, you will be blocked from editing. Anonymous DissidentTalk -- (dated 11:07, 19 June 2007 UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block and action could be taken against the individual behind this IP address. -- KOS | talk 12:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. the_undertow talk 09:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Marcel Ospel. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 14:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Boat lift:

Your recent edit to Boat lift (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lassi

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lassi, you will be blocked from editing. Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 07:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Session fixation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cheers, Lights (♣ • ♦) 11:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to IBM System i. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 10:26, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Software bug, you will be blocked from editing. Excirial (Talk,Contribs) 09:21, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Royapuram. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- Whpq 18:46, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Trisha Krishnan:

Your recent edit to Trisha Krishnan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 07:52, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jurm (1990 film), you will be blocked from editing. Harland1 (t/c) 11:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Bhavana Balachandran appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Doczilla (talk) 07:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Your recent edit to Physical layer (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 15:16, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for experimenting with the page Chiranjeevi, and for reverting your edits. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox next time.

[edit] January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Freaks, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Freaks was changed by 203.91.207.30 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-01-30T08:16:57+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to January 16. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 04:08, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Social Network, you will be blocked from editing. If you continue to make unconstructive edits, you will be blocked! Editortothemasses (talk) 04:39, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Alex Bakharev (talk) 08:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Your recent edit to Lollu Sabha (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 13:19, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matanga, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Matanga was changed by 203.91.207.30 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-06T09:21:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 09:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, I reverted some of your recent edits you made to business model, as you deleted authorship attribution, citations, and some essential parts to the template model, such as the relationships. Cheers, Thinkstorm (talk) 08:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Muhammed Yusuf Khan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 13:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Troy (film). If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Peter cohen (talk) 08:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)’

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to TCP and UDP port.
Any further vandalism will result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Philip Trueman (talk) 10:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism despite numerous blocks and warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Doczilla STOMP! 05:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)