User talk:203.200.35.31

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Tindivanam

Your recent edit to Tindivanam (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 00:52, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Image:Siouxsie Prudence.jpg:

Your recent edit to Image:Siouxsie Prudence.jpg (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 13:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Shining

Its irrevelant in that it doesn't add any information on the article. Some band or the Simpsons making fun of the Shining isn't notable, its just fancruft.--CyberGhostface 19:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Cute. I ask...how is an obscure game poking fun at the Shining NOTABLE to understanding the novel?--CyberGhostface 20:12, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
There are thousands of Shining references. What makes yours so important to the article? Just because its 'true' doesn't make it notable or important.--CyberGhostface 20:17, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for being so mature about this situation and not blowing things out of proportion.--CyberGhostface 20:21, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I really don't care about Blood. Obviously if Blood were to use ideas from the Shining, that should be noted in its own respective article. But nearly EVERYONE parodies the Shining nowadays, and hardly any of them are notable in the main article for the novel.--CyberGhostface 20:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I apologize for acting the way I did as well.--CyberGhostface 20:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Warnings

Thank you for experimenting with the page Correlation on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. — Chris53516 (Talk) 14:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Please don't be silly

Please don't mess about with joke edits, such as your edit to Convection - we try hard here to produce something we can all be proud of - silliness doesn't help. Articles are monitored and users messing about face a block or a ban. Why not try and contribute something useful instead? Have a look at the below and get stuck in properly:

  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help pages
  Tutorial
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...

Thanks - and enjoy yourself as a responsible Wikipedian!

JohnCub 15:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)