User talk:201.19.140.152

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 "It does not need to do so. It's implicit throughout that Icke's "critics", "that many distinguished persons" you mention, are part of the full-blooded or hybrids who control our world. Who would believe them??? You sound suspicious. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.19.140.152 (talk) 01:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC). "

I myself went through a period of believing Icke's 'story' of how the world is run. If Icke's story is believed in its entirety, then you are bound to be paranoid, as the person making the above comment surely is. Anyone raising sceptical doubt about Icke's theories are labelled as part of the 'Reptilian agenda'. The whole reptilian thing is based on hearsay and allegory, which is not evidence.

I love some of the points Icke raises individually, such as there may be an elite organisation, which orchestrates world events to the tune of their own sinister agenda, but when Icke weaves all these individual threads together to form his 'story', then in all probability the end result is fallacious. This is because certain pieces of 'evidence' he presents, which constitute the foundations of his theory, would not stand up to scientific scrutiny, such as his theory that Jupiter and Venus came into our solar system some 6000 years ago and that the Sumerian Gods (the Annunaki) were really Reptilian Humanoids. They could equally be fish people.