User talk:201.133.210.33

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, 201.133.210.33, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Idont Havaname 23:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

You look like a solid contributor, and I encourage you to register an account here as well! --Idont Havaname 23:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)

Please read WP:NPOV. Some of your edits have been highly opinionated, which is not appropriate for Wikipedia. In addition, Wikipedia has a policy against "original research", which means that if you're going to include information about why a movie was successful or not (it's not our place to label one a "failure", let alone a "huge" one), it has to come from previous published sources. You made some good arguments for why Peter Pan (2003 movie) didn't do as well as the studio hoped, but they were arguments not facts. Tverbeek 11:17, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Are you deliberately violating Wikipedia policy, or do you not understand it? Tverbeek 20:08, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

You still seem to lack a basic understanding of neutral point of view. Please read and understand this page before making further edits.—chris.lawson (talk) 02:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

You can continue this nonsense as long as you like, but other, more responsible Wikipedia editors will remove whatever opinions and arguments you insert into articles. We'll outlast you. Tverbeek 11:05, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

What part of Wikipedia's NPOV policy do you not understand? Continuing to defy it like this will only get you banned. Maybe then you can set up the "My personal opinion about what movies were successful and why" web site that you're trying to turn Wikipedia into. P.S. Changing American spelling to British spelling (or vice versa) without a good reason is considered rude... if you care about that. Tverbeek 02:33, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

We're looking for substantiated facts here. And correct ones. (And we do have a policy that either British or American spelling is acceptable, as long as each article is internally consistent.) I'm trying not to attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance, but some of your recent edits do look like deliberate, bratty wrecking attempts. There are more than enough people who care about Wikipedia to undo whatever you pull. You want a blog, go get a blog -- this is an encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eritain (talk • contribs) 03:32, 9 August 2005