Talk:2006 Rugby League Tri-Nations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Results table
Why is there a second results table? If the points were expunged they were expunged. The actual results of the game are listed in the article still.--dan, dan and dan 20:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Its especially pointless now that NZ is last in both tables, might as well get rid of it Mattlore 23:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Do not call it pointless and vandalism. Firstly it has a point because it shows how the grannygate saga has affected New Zealand in the rl tri nations. Secondly, it it NOT VANDALISM. Rugby 666
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Rugby League Tri-Nations Logo.png
Image:Rugby League Tri-Nations Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)