Talk:2004 NCAA Division I-A football rankings

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2004 NCAA Division I-A football rankings article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	College football Portal 2004 NCAA Division I-A football rankings is part of WikiProject College football, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Assessment Comments This article has been rated for quality but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Link for polls

In case anyone wants to know, ESPN has both the AP and Coaches Poll rankings here http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/rankingsindex?pollId=null&weekNumber=1&seasonYear=2004. Also, I came across a rankings tie in week 11 between Virginia and Florida State with UVA going up and FSU going down and no ranking for the 14th slot in the poll. I'm not an advanced coder so I don't know if it is possible to get both colors in that same box. E Pluribus Unum 10:10, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The way to handle it is just make it look like it's one box. It happened in Week 2 of the 2006 AP so you can look there for more info. But you just add style="border-bottom:1px solid white;" after the bgcolor= item to the top box that it occurs. You can then change the bgcolor for each box. That's the solution we've put in. It looks better than doubling the entry for one box which throws the whole table off. --MECU≈talk 12:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)