Talk:1st SS Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The SS weren't just fighting units, they embodied the spirit of Nazism. Perhaps this is justified in the case of LSSAH, however to call 13.WGDdSS(kroatische) or 36.WGDdSS the embodiment of the spirit of Nazisim is pushing it. Perhaps this arguement belongs on the Waffen SS page rather than a divisional history.--Ansbachdragoner 8 July 2005 06:01 (UTC)
- This became increasingly less true as the war went on. For instance, men were conscripted into the Waffen SS who were not members of the Nazi party. I don't see any reason for there not to be a separate article on the division.Larry Dunn 16:35, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Ardennes Offensive
Shouldn't there be a mention of the unit's involvement in the battle of the bulge?
--216.108.206.240 04:18, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
There will be. That and the Cherkassy battles, Normandy Battles, Frülingserwachen and the final battles around Vienna. This article is a WIP at the min.--Ansbachdragoner 03:08, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Meaning of the list at the start of the article
Can someone tell me what the list of names at the start of the article signifies? It isn't clear. Grant65 | Talk 11:59, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
I believe it;s the list of formations that the Leibstandarte formed over time. However, it was clearly in the wrong place so I've moved it here for the time being. 13:06, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
--
- Stabswache (SA controlled)
- Stoßtrupp Adolf Hitler (SA controlled)
- Stabswache
SS-Stabswache Berlin
- SS-Sonderkommando Zossen
- SS-Sonderkommando Jüterbog
SS-Sonderkommando Berlin
Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler
Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
Infanterie-Regiment (mot.) Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
SS-Division (mot.) Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
SS-Panzergrenadier-Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
1.SS-Panzer-Division Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler
[edit] WAR CRIMES
One should add a POV tag to this article. What about the many war crimes committed by this unit???
-Do you have any in mind? if not, be quiet.
-I certainly agree with the first comment; this reads as an extremely sanitised history; without a great deal of looking there is the Wormhout massacre during the battle for france; the sentencing to death in absentia by the Soviets of Sepp Deitrich for war crimes in Kharkov. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.194.55.56 (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Normandy
This section needs a bit of a rewrite to make it more encyclopedic in tone (& needs references). Maybe I'll have a go if no-one objects? EyeSereneTALK 20:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:LSAH.jpg
Image:LSAH.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:19, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Good
Very well made article compared to other Wikipedia articles on specific divisions in a country's armed forces. Compliments to whoever wrote this up ColombianConservative 07:05, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
True. But polished though. Leibstandarte took part to many famous atrocities, these being:
- Wormhout, near Dunkirk, May 1940. Leibstandarte unit led by Wilhelm Mohnke executed a bunch of surrendered British soldiers from The Royal Warwickshire Regiment, Cheshire Regiment and some soldiers of the Royal Artillery. There's a sign on the place with this info.
- LSSAH followed the Commissar order issued by Hitler in June 1941 with pride, as it was it's code to be the most loyal unit there was and also because Dietrich was a personal friend of Hitler.
- Yefremovka and Semevka, villages near Kharkov, February 1943. Leibstandarte battalion (III/2. PzGrenRgt) led by Joachim Peiper killed over 800. In Yefremovka about 250 were collected in a church, which was then burned with the rest of the village. Hence the name "The Blow-Torch Battalion".
- Boves Massacre in Italy September 1943. Again Peiper's LSSAH boys in action, this time they killed at least 64, although part of them were partisans, but rest were civilians, women, children and old people.
- Malmedy massacre, during the Battle of Bulge in December 1944-January 1945 Kampfgruppe Peiper, consisting mainly of LSSAH, killed hundreds of American POW's and Belgian civilians.
To keep the article truthful and non-biased, these should be included. --Ukas (talk) 01:09, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:LSAH.jpg
Image:LSAH.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Meaning of the skeleton key
Correct me if I haven't read the article closely enough, but I believe no mention has been made of the reason why the Leibstandarte's divisional insignia was a skeleton key. It of course honours their leader Sepp Dietrich, since the German word for skeleton key (presumably from the name of the product's original manufacturer) is Dietrich. Nuttyskin (talk) 13:45, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Place and date of surrender
Anyone has this?--mrg3105mrg3105 If you're not taking any flack, you're not over the target. 10:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Assessment
As part of the WP:MILHIST B class check, this article just stays as a B class however it needs many more inline citations. SGGH speak! 20:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)