User talk:198.97.67.58

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 198.97.67.58, is registered to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. —thames 18:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Illegal immigration to the United States

You've twice deleted sourced material from Illegal immigration to the United States while referrig to a note on the talk page. That page has dozens of notes. Which one are you referring to? -Will Beback 12:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Do not remove warnings from your talk page!

Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Abstract Idiot (talk · contribs)

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. east.718 19:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] User pages

Don't edit the user pages of this or other IPs. If you want a user page of yor own then register. --Will Beback 16:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

This user page belongs to all users of this IP. If you are the sole user then say so. Otherwise do not remove messages which may be meant for other users sharing this IP. -Will Beback 17:05, 4 August 2006 (UTC)


Err, correct me if I'm wrong, but these chaps have been sending packetas of data accross a network to a publicly accesable HTTP server. How can that be called network abuse? Network abuse is when I place a sploit on your server to send out my spam email. Inserting faggoty ass text into a faggoty ass website isn't network abuse. Do you seriously think the US Army is going to give a fuck about your faggoty little fucking website? Jeez.

Fag. --Tess Tickle 00:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Trinity

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. Can I say that your decision to contribute is much appreciated. We reallywant many people to contibute to Wikipedia. I wanted to talk to you about your edits to Trinity. You added some comments to the article, which are valid comments but don't really belong in an encyclopedia. At Wikipedia we have some rules and guidelines for contributions. Two of the important ones are Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Please have a look at these if you have not yet done so.

In order to be verifiable any theories that you add to a page must be attributed to at least one person - not yourself, and a reliable source - see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. The things you wrote really boil down to opinion. Even if a 'large number of strict monotheists' believe this, then there needs to be a quoted source to back it up. In addition some of the quotes you mention are not really relevant to Trinitarianism. Some could be cited both for and against the idea of the Trinity.

I've remove these quotes. Please have a look at these Wikipedia guidelines before adding anything else. Discussing things with other editors is also a good idea. If you want to do this, or have more questions relating to Trinity I suggest adding them to Talk:Trinity. DJ Clayworth 18:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)


If

[edit] Did I find you?

Is this Psychohistorian? I've searched for you, but you do not seem to be active? How goes it? Witch hunt still on? Have you invested in a sturdy broom yet?  ;) I've been out - father had a stroke and I was needed there more than I needed Wiki. Chicaneo 07:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Norman Cota

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Norman Cota page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Daysleeper47 (talk) 16:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)