User talk:198.97.67.56

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 198.97.67.56, is registered to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has now been removed. Please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for any other tests you want to do, since testing material in articles will normally be removed quickly. Please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing here. Thanks.

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 19:26, 2004 Aug 11 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] December 19, 2005

[edit] "WHO DEY"

This message is regarding the page Cincinnati Bengals. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 18:28, Dec. 19, 2005


[edit] User pages

Don't edit the user pages of this or other IPs. If you want a user page of yor own then register. -Will Beback 16:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Marine Security Guards

Before any additional edits to the Marine Security Guard article please review wikipedia's policy on Neutral Point of View and Original Research. NeoFreak 17:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Looper5920 12:06, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Delta Sigma Theta

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Delta Sigma Theta. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --JFreeman (talk) 19:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] IIUS Template

I keep showing you and proving otherwise - but you keep insisting on saying that I said we should add the gangs article - and now you accuse me of making the debate personal. In reality - I never said we should just add the gangs article. I did not support gangs being added - I merely said if you feel strongly about adding something about gangs - i.e like you did about ms13, then perhaps you should add something about illegal immigration to the gangs article and then we can add the gangs article here - since there was no support for putting ms in. Here is the actual quote

“ Gangs would be the alternative - personally I think we shouldn't put anything - however you yourself could add things to gangs about illegal immigration and then we could add it. ”

danielfolsom 20:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Obviously now I assume since I did add gangs - that your ok with not adding ms13 ... please tell me if I am not correct in this statement (or if I am correct - just so I know you got the message, you can never tell with public ip addresses) - because frankly I'm happy to continue the debate - and I might be open to adding ms if you can convince me that the current gangs article is not accurate enough. All I'm asking is that you don't misrepresent my comments (as stated above) - however regardless I do admit that I overreacted a bit, and for that I am sorry. Assuming the discussion is over, I hope to see you in the future on Wikipedia - your obviously a good editor.danielfolsom 02:55, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] And we know you are an alter-ego

Being anon! Chivista 18:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Test

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia as you did with this edit. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -Will Beback · † · 19:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Illegal immigration to the United States, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. EliminatorJR Talk 18:57, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Did I find you?

Is this Psychohistorian? I've searched for you, but you do not seem to be active? How goes it? Witch hunt still on? Have you invested in a sturdy broom yet?  ;) I've been out - father had a stroke and I was needed there more than I needed Wiki. Chicaneo 07:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Tecumseh (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Yeti has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Abrech (talk) 18:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Flying Spaghetti Monster, The Reformed Church of. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. Ale_Jrbtalk 18:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Flying Spaghetti Monster, The Reformed Church of, you will be blocked from editing. Ale_Jrbtalk 18:24, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

You said"You have violated the 3RR rule in Illegal immigration to the United States. The rule is as follows, "An editor must not perform more than three reverts, in whole or in part, on a single page within a 24-hour period. A revert means undoing the actions of another editor, whether involving the same or different material each time." You have done six reverts of that page in a 24 hour period. Consider this the obligatory warning.-198.97.67.56 (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)"

I say, you should stop vandalism work. You performed multiple acts of vandalism on work I had submitted. I suggest you enter into Discussion instead of indiscriminately removing, changing, moving , etc material that has just been entered. I count an equal number of acts of vandalism from you in just a few minutes. Reasonable people do not vandalism what they disagree with - they discuss it in a civilized manner. Consider this the obligatory warning.


Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Cool beans‎ page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rossami (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)