User talk:198.246.246.8

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Acute respiratory distress syndrome

Thank you for experimenting with the page Acute respiratory distress syndrome on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  — JVinocur (talk • contribs) 16:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)



[edit] March 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Some of your recent edits, such as those you made to Dan Garvin, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Topdeck 06:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] Caution: Vandalism on Delta Sigma Theta. using TW

[edit] April 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Delta Sigma Theta. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Real96 22:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vasoconstriction, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tanvir che (talk) 10:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page DBpoweramp do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.   Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'resolve 74.86.85.148' . Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Cool beans has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to R-tardopathy. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: R-tardopathy was changed by 198.246.246.8 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-05-14T13:09:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] My edit on twins

May I ask why you referred my edit? Quite clearly the article was præsented in a fashion which assumed that it was 'unthinkable' that siblings procreate with each other. Which actually happens, and even happens in western cultures. Also it this genetic information apply not only to humans, but to all vertebrates at least by which it is a far less rare occurrence.. Though I realize it is an extremely rare occurrence that the MZ twins are both of a different gender and desire to procreate with each other. Its style of writing still was giving out a tone that a certain taboo in western civilizations is unthinkable to occur. I shall undo your undo by virtue that there are a lot of complaints on this page regarding your less than adequate behaviour as a wikipedian and that my own talk page is, and has been, devoid of such. If you think this is not valid a decision, I would ask you to talk with me about it first as to not invoke a edit war. As a sign of my good will, I will say that I shall not change it back if you edit it back again without talking to you again, to counter the occurrence of an edit war in this case. Niarch (talk) 09:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

A sorry, I misread something, I thought you undid my edit while in fact you changed a typo I noticed myself earlier but forgot to change, my mistake indeed, pardon, sir/madam. Niarch (talk) 09:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)