User talk:198.172.206.148

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 198.172.206.148, is registered to {{{1}}}, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
An editor has expressed a concern that this user may be a sock puppet of Joehazelton.
Please refer to editing habits and/or contributions; this policy subsection may also be helpful.

Account information: block logcurrent autoblockseditslogs

[edit] February 2007

All contributions are strongly appreciated and encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Joehazelton may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user himself, please login under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. SilverhandTalk 04:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice

[edit] Last warning

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. -- ReyBrujo 04:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

You have recently vandalized a Wikipedia article, and you are now being asked to stop this type of behavior. You're welcome to continue editing Wikipedia, so long as these edits are constructive. Please see Wikipedia's Blocking policy and what constitutes vandalism; such actions are not tolerated on Wikipedia, and are not taken lightly.

We hope that you will become a legitimate editor. Again, you are welcome here at Wikipedia, but remember not to vandalize or you will soon be blocked from editing.

If you feel you have received this message in error, it may be because you are using a shared IP address. Nevertheless, repeated vandalism from this address may cause you to be included in any future sanctions such as temporary blocks or bans. To avoid confusion in the future, we invite you to create a user account of your own.--Hu12 04:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --rogerd 04:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comments

This is a talk page of a IP number as such, its usage and ownership is shared among many editors. So, any accusations of misuse, sock puppetry, or to like is pointless, not relevant and a waste of time

it will be a very good day for the Internet, when Wikipedia is brought down either through class-action lawsuits, or it is diminished, because its reputation as an unreliable source of information and is diminished to a point of illrelevancy.

I choose to be a bit more optimistic. But that's just me. Free, open, true knowledge isn't easy to come by. If it's impossible, then Wikipedia will fail. You place your hope in whatever you wish, and I, in what I deem best. Cheers, GracenotesT § 04:51, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Your set of ethics is clearly different than mine... not much we can do about it. I choose to look at Wikipedia as an ideal, one will never compare fully with what it is now. But, one can only get so close. Finally, there are two sides to time wasting: 1. The vandalism-reverters 2. the vandals. Just because someone does an action with which you agree does not mean that their motives are the best. Cheers, GracenotesT § 05:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)