User talk:198.163.179.19

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

School IP address Attention:

This IP address, 198.163.179.19, is registered to The Winnipeg School Division No. 1 and may be shared by multiple users of an educational institution. In the case of institutions using proxy servers, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason a message intended for one person may be received by another. Similarly an innocent user may get blocked for another user's vandalism. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case please read our advice on this situation.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block with the template {{schoolblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

 Note: In the event of persistent vandalism from primary and secondary schools, anonymous editing may be disabled for up to 1 year at a time. Abuse reports may also be forwarded to your school administration for investigation in case of long-term abuse by registered users.
School staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


This page has been temporarily semi-protected from editing to prevent disruptive actions.

 Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled to prevent 198.163.179.19 (talk • contribs • block logauto) and other new users from making disruptive edits.
See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account.

Contents

Warnings

Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings.
Older warnings may have been deleted, but are still visible in the page history.
[Admin: block | unblock / Info: contribs | interiot's tool | page moves | block log | block list]

May 2007

  1. Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Garfield. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --LuigiManiac 15:33, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
    This is a terminal located at a public high school; I would advise that very little tolerance be taken, as it will likely spawn quite a lot of vandalism. Eltargrim 15:50, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Your recent edit to William Baffin (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 19:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Abstract Art, you will be blocked from editing. Dumelow 15:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
    This is a shared IP by several schools in Winnipeg. Needless to say, schoolkids aren't the most mature people. May as well block us. Saves the rest of you trouble in the long run. But hey, I speak for myself... 198.163.179.19 15:53, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to School uniform, you will be blocked from editing. --Nlu (talk) 18:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Slapstick. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Katieh5584 14:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. Your recent edit to Hypersonic (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning for editing Princess Peach (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 18:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
    -SpuriousQ (talk) 18:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  1. Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Bronze. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Will (aka Wimt) 19:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Aude (talk) 16:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Purple City Productions, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Sunshine Man 18:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Taras Shevchenko, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. The Sunshine Man 14:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  • You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Moreschi Talk 15:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
  1. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Electronic arts, you will be blocked from editing. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 15:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lombard Street (San Francisco), was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Chris 20:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ice hockey, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 18:31, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  4. This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ice hockey, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 18:33, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
  5. Your recent edit to Walrus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Blocked
    You have been blocked for vandalism for a few more days. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

    If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

    Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. Kukini hablame aqui 18:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Teletoon, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Spartan-James 18:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
    If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

July 2007

  1. Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to April 24. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eddie 18:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to April 24, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 18:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  3. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to September 21, you will be blocked from editing. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 17:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Ancient history. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Flyguy649 talk contribs 18:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Satire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --barneca (talk) 14:58, 11 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your final warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fightin' Texas Aggie Band, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to John Steinbeck:

Your recent edit to John Steinbeck (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Perez Hilton:

Your recent edit to Perez Hilton (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Beer, you will be blocked from editing. SJP 19:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Algebra, you will be blocked from editing. Reporting to AIV. Bfigura (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 17

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Aloe vera. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 15:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Aloe vera, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Look, please just block us. It will save wikipedians much hassle to block us. But as it is, it's far too easy for someone to vandalize. Having requested a block for us, I would like to remind you that I am not a represtentative of the school. Merely my own opinion. 198.163.179.19 16:27, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 16:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)


This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Phosphorus cycle, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 18:36, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Phosphorus cycle, you will be blocked from editing. delldot talk 18:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Plasma display, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 18:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Liquid crystal display television. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Oxymoron83 19:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to Giraffe:

Your recent edit to Giraffe (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 19:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Desert, you will be blocked from editing.  — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 19:44, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —DerHexer (Talk) 19:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)