User talk:198.151.12.10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 198.151.12.10, is registered to Science Applications International Corporation, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


Hi there! I've posted a message for your at Talk:Zombie Panic!. --Diberri | Talk 14:44, Aug 10, 2004 (UTC)

In List of languages by total speakers your numbers for native speakers seem to be wrong, e.g. there are definitely not 1.75 billion native mandarin speakers. 193.171.121.30 07:12, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Re: Iroquois

People who spot vandalism are encouraged to revert back to the last uncorrupted version in the history. See Wikipedia:How to revert a page to an earlier version. Cheers, BanyanTree 17:52, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, the reason I edited things as I did is that the vandalism showed up in the current display of the article, but when I attempted to edit it, the edit screen for the current version did not show the vandalism as being there. It just showed it as it should be, so I hit "Save page" and it did, and went back to displaying the article again, but still with the vandalism there. I figured that there might be a database bug or something screwed up on my end, so I was looking for a second opinion to see if it was just me.

Thanks for the tip on reverting the article to a previous version.

Twilight

[edit] adding yourself to San Diego

Hi there Matt. Thanks for your interest in Wikipedia, but please don't add yourself to articles without cause. Please see WP:VAIN for more information on this. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:07, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Doc (?) 23:08, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Hello Matt, I see you've found my user page. Please make worthwhile edits instead of putting nonsense on the Wikipedia. If you make another such edit I will block you for 24 hours. Fernando Rizo T/C 23:14, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jonathan235 16:08, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 16:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Bill Barker, you will be blocked from editing. → AA (talk) — 23:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] here is the thing

The widescreen comments are justifiable and wholly accurate. I Reverted your edits--130.108.192.194 (talk) 23:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Arlington, Oregon. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tanthalas39 (talk) 20:21, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.