User talk:196.46.0.6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 196.46.0.6, is registered to TV-Cabo, Mozambique, and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

I reverted your edits on the population of Lisbon since the official population of the city (as defined by the city authority limits) is 500.000 and not 1.500.000. Even though it is true that the metropolitan area has a much larger population, over 2.000.000, that should be refered under population of the Lisbon metropolitan area since most of these people live outside the council of Lisbon jurisdiction area. Salvadorjo 15:38, 6 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. [[Sam Korn]] 14:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the article Laura Bush. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia that people have worked hard to create. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ contribs • block • block log ] -- pgk(talk) 09:39, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Thatdog 00:02, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Viriditas | Talk 00:58, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] IGN

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Olorin28 17:16, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sango123 (talk) 17:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Knysna

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. dewet|™ 20:15, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] STOP

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ancient Greek, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. the_ed17(talk) Use these! 16:57, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Why do you make good edits for two weeks and then vandalise one or two for one day???? the_ed17(talk)Use these! 19:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blatant Vandalism: Final Warning!

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Fred Phelps, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Chuchunezumi 22:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] 2 September, 2006

It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed content from Ancient Rome. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. --james(talk) 14:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Wikipedia:Traffic, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -DESU 07:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Drug abuse. It is considered vandalism which, under Wikipedia guidelines, can lead to blocks being applied. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --Ann Stouter 08:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I reverted your edits on Paul Allen, as I could not find any confirming sources for your unattributed information about his serious accident. If you were testing how editing in Wikipedia works, please use the Sandbox for any other tests. Thanks. Branflakes 22:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Maputo, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Douglasmtaylor 18:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] January 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Buenos Aires. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Specifically, why did you remove the ISBN from two book descriptions? Green Giant (talk) 09:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] April 2008

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Stage (theatre), even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Oxymoron83 10:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to David Shore has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. SharkfaceT/C 23:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)