User talk:196.207.32.38

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

LOL, this is a Vodacom IP. Don't think there is such a thing as an open proxy in South Africa.

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Zibusiso Mkhwanazi

Your recent edit to Zibusiso Mkhwanazi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Betamax

Your recent edit to Betamax (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 15:10, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] April 2007

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Conan the Barbarian (film) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Real96 10:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Yeah sure, only problem is that accounts created get blocked and no reason is stated and then we are expected to just sit back and wait while admins take holiday. I am getting sick of this fucking shit.

[edit] Regarding edits to Springbok Radio

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 196.207.32.38! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule .+\.multiply\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 09:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Striptease

Continually re-inserting the name of an unnotable dancer at an unnotable strip club on to the Striptease article will get you blocked. You can ask admins, you can do a "Request for Comment" you can look at the other photographs of the strippers on the page (none of which identify the dancers). Regardless, the information simply won't stay. If you revert again, I will raise the issue to the broader Wikipedia community myself. Thanks. --David Shankbone 13:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Orangemarlin 02:38, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Please make a case for your position at Talk:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). Instead of edit-warring, why not try making your case via discussion? Guettarda 15:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Your POV is unsupported by the references. Plain and simple. Policy states that your unsourced POV statements should be removed and that is what I will continue to do. -196.207.32.38 15:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Please make a case for your position at Talk:Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate). Guettarda 16:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Why not just create an account?

What value does having making edits from one IP address have over making edits from one name? One is numbers, the other is a name--and with a name, your edits have more credibility. I don't get it; it's difficult to have much sympathy for an open proxy.--David Shankbone 21:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

THIS IS NOT AN OPEN PROXY. I created an account but it just got blocked without reason because of this ip. -196.207.32.38 21:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Funny thing is that whois doesn't say anything about an open proxy and reverse dns says IT IS a Vodacom ip. -196.207.32.38 21:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Try release and renew ip. [1] •Jim62sch• 17:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Someone scanned this address and stated that this IP is not an open proxy.

Request handled by: Jesse Viviano 02:47, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Jonathan Wells (intelligent design advocate), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 00:36, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mining, you will be blocked from editing. --Geniac 20:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)