User talk:195.92.67.74

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This host, webcacheh10a.cache.pol.co.uk, is registered to Cable & Wireless (UK), an Internet service provider through which numerous individual users may connect to the Internet via proxy. This IP address may be reassigned to a different person when the current user disconnects.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism, in which case, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user.


Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.


(See page history for older messages.)


Contents

[edit] March 2007

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Joe D (t) 22:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users. Thank you. Luke! 00:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Kate Silverton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks – Qxz 16:54, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Kate Silverton. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gtg204y 17:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Mary Shelley, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. 18:24, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Ronnie O'Sullivan (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Your repeated vandalism of Loose Women on 19th April 2007 is unwelcome, point of view and has been reverted. This your last warning before this IP address is been reported to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and you are blocked. Parmesan 21:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Has been made to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism Parmesan 12:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Loose Women, you will be blocked from editing. Will (aka Wimt) 22:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to User:Sodaplayer, you will be blocked from editing. Real96 06:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Mais oui! 17:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The date column shows when the polls were taken, not when they were published in a newspaper. 195.92.67.74 18:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Sammy Lee (footballer) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 21:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sammy Lee (footballer), you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. xompanthy 21:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for 1 month in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru talk 22:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] May 2007

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Leona Lewis, you will be blocked from editing. James, La gloria è a dio 22:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Anas talk? 17:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Anas talk? 17:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gaia hypothesis. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Proski 23:02, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Gordon Brown (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 11:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gordon Brown, you will be blocked from editing. Tomayres 11:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Gordon Brown, you will be blocked from editing. Tomayres 11:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 1 month. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so may be considered disruptive. KOS | talk 11:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Rickitt, you will be blocked from editing. Brusegadi 22:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Patrick Moore. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~ Wikihermit 17:40, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tiscali SpA, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tiscali SpA was changed by 195.92.67.74 (c) (t) score equals -4355 on 2007-08-19T05:06:38+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 09:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] oct 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Georgia O'Keeffe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --lquilter 17:39, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jack P. Shepherd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] November 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ivybridge, you will be blocked from editing. J-ſtanTalkContribs 21:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

[edit] Your edits to Mary Shelley

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Mary Shelley, you will be blocked from editing.

Keith D 20:46, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Steam train

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Steam train, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Steam train. Fabrictramp (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Your recent edit to Wimbledon High School (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)