User talk:195.92.67.67

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image:Info-pictogram.png Attention:

This IP address, 195.92.67.67, is registered to Energis UK and is shared by multiple users. Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact Energis UK to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. However, you will still be unable to edit Wikipedia while the IP you are using is blocked.

This IP address is regularly used by User:Nick Boulevard, as well as other contributors
Interestingly, I have only ever used this IP a few times by accident, however, another user who seems to be in constant dissagreement with me now uses this IP also? Nick Boulevard 23:15, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

Hello there seem as you've been doing much good work on the wikipedia. It migh be a good idea for you to log in with a username and account. If you want to do this see here for more details:

http://meta.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaWiki_User%27s_Guide:_Logging-in

Cheers G-Man 12:06, 13 May 2004 (UTC)


Hello. When Andy is accusing you of abuse, he is referring to you saying things like 'I have never known such a pedantic (or troublesome) person... ever.' . Morwen 18:42, May 15, 2004 (UTC)

By the way, I've now protected the page, as per your request. Morwen 18:49, May 15, 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] A link that you broke

In standard deviation, there was a perfectly good link to the article titled normal distribution that you replaced with a link to a non-existent Wikipedia article titled normal, ie normally distributed. Nor does that make sense as an article title. I've restored the link. Also, the term data set is entirely standard, and to think that it is synonymous with set of data is questionable at best. Michael Hardy 03:52, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view if you have not already done so.

The edits you made to Opus Dei completely contradict what is already written. If you think that the previous version of the article was wrong, you should make an entry on the talk page saying why, and giving some sources backing up your point of view. In the meantime I have changed your edits back. I hope it goes without saying that novels do not count as sources for a factual encyclopedia. DJ Clayworth 18:27, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] GEC

I've removed a section from the GEC page which was copied directly from Everything Electrical: a Brief History of GEC. As far as I can see it is copyrighted by the Marconi Corporation plc. Mark 15:14, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 18 August 2005

Regarding this edit: Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Hall Monitor 23:28, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 6 September 2005

You have been blocked on account of repeated vandalism.[1][2][3] If you have criticisms of a person or group, please summarize then in an NPOV manner using verifiable sources. -Willmcw 01:39, September 7, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Illinois governors

I see the work you are doing today. Anyone can edit, but there are advantages to creating an account if you want to contribute regularly. To join, create an account and then introduce yourself to the community at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- DS1953 talk 17:56, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

  1. Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. --lightdarkness (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2006 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. pgk(talk) 18:21, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 19:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Adolf Hitler's inspection of the German Workers' Party

An editor has nominated Adolf Hitler's inspection of the German Workers' Party, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolf Hitler's inspection of the German Workers' Party (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)