User talk:195.82.106.47

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, while I appreciate that you may have legitimate concerns, I don't think that vandalising RfC pages is the appropriate way forward in this dispute. You are only hurting both your case and Canaens case. Please consider stopping and trying to reach consensus by other means. Some policies you might like to review: WP:POINT, WP:Civility, WP:NPA. Thanks! :) - FrancisTyers 02:11, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Please do not blank talk pages, even if you are having a disagreement with someone. This also further hurts your RfC.--Shanel 03:13, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

So if you disagree with the comments, they become evidence. You should never blank other users' comments on talk pages unless they are blatantly offensive personal attacks/copyvio/something else for speedy deletion. (ESkog)(Talk) 03:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

  • I don't see where Viriditas has removed comments from the Veganism talk page. Are you talking about edits somewhere else? (ESkog)(Talk) 04:07, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 24 hour block

I have blocked you for 24 hours for your violation of the three revert rule on the Veganism article. Apart from the 3RR violation, you are emitting a constant stream of personal attacks, and are disrupting the proper functioning of the encyclopedia. Your behavior is absolutely shameful and inexcusable. If I see any further disruption from you on this or any other article, I will apply a longer block. Good day. Nandesuka 04:10, 24 December 2005 (UTC)