User talk:195.75.78.206

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi, would you mind awfully not replacing pages with drivel? Thanks. If you want to experiment, try this page.--Rambutan (talk) 16:48, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] June 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Millfield. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 14:10, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


[edit] Hamites don't exist

Somali people genetics

^Please look at the wiki article, they are closely related to people of northern Kenya and only have 15% foreign admixture, less than African Americans (who are 20% European on average). So incidentally they are more African than a lot of people even from the Diaspora. Are you User Apostolos Margaritis?Taharqa 20:26, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made to Donald Rumsfeld during August 3, 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. JCO312 18:15, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Donald Rumsfeld, you will be blocked from editing. Liverpool Scouse 18:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.


Until you produce textual and genetic evidence for your bogus claims, I will not debate you on it. I have provided genetic empirical study showing that they only have 15% genetic input from foreigners and all you can do is rant about subjective looks. Refer to the data.. - Taharqa

This is your last warning.
The next time you insert a spam link, as you did to Talk:Vanessa Anne Hudgens, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from any site that uses the MediaWiki spam blacklist, which includes all of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. --Yamla 16:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] September 2007

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Gaydar (website), you will be blocked from editing. Nick Cooper 15:26, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to Wikipedia articles about living persons, as you did to Anina (model). Thank you. Versageek 03:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] Natasha Kaplinsky

Hello. I have reverted your edit to Natasha Kaplinsky because the information you added was out of context in that particular section. If you want to re-add it in a more appropriate place, please feel free to do so, but remember that you will hav to provide a reliable source to back up what you are saying. Thank you. Paul20070 (talk) 19:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to James Whale (radio) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 20:49, 4 February 2008 (UTC)