User talk:195.7.252.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during November 8, 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Asteriontalk 20:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] José Eduardo Dos Santos

Please do not add profanity to articles, as you did to José Eduardo dos Santos. If you would like to discuss content changes, you may do so in a civil manner on the article's talk page. Thanks, Dar-Ape 23:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


If there were some sort of documented evidence that JES was born in Sao Tome or that there are many people who believe that he is not born there then that information could be included in something like a "controversy" section of the page. The academic world believes that he is an Mbundu born in Luanda. So it would not be right to change the article because you know a "well known secret". There are people who still believe that the world is flat but when you look up Earth it describes it as being round but gives attention to the fact that there are people who truly believe that it is flat. So, if the information is going to be on the page, we need to know who believes it and what their grounds are for believing it and some sort of documentation, a website or book or something. I am not trying to be difficult but to be fair.--Nathan Holland 00:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

The Fact that the Angolan Dictator was born in Sao Tome e Principe is a well know fact. Not a "controversy"

[edit] Jose Eduardo dos Santos Born in Sao Tome e Principe

The Fact that the Angolan Dictator was born in Sao Tome e Principe is a well know fact. Not a "controversy"


Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cabinda (province). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 19:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Jose Eduardo dos Santos, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. --// >|< Shablog 19:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


"The Fact that the Angolan Dictator was born in Sao Tome e Principe is a well know fact. Not a "controversy""

If is well known then show us who an example or some documentation of the "fact". If you can show that many Angolans believe that he was born in Sao Tome then that information might deserve a place on the page. --Nathan Holland 05:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Adding Informative accurate and TRUE FACTS

The Man is a Dictator is unelected is a lier, as ordered the assasination of people has ordered the massacre of people can kill at pleasure is immune!!!!!

We cannot allow this web site to be used to potrait him as an angel or a Great African leader he is neither.

[edit] José Eduardo dos Santos

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to José Eduardo dos Santos. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Lmcelhiney 17:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cabinda (province)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia as you did to Cabinda (province). It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Lmcelhiney 18:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Biographical Information Concerning Living Persons

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not add unreferenced negative biographical information concerning living persons to Wikipedia articles. Thank you.

--Nathan Holland 16:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan Holland, PHD in Angolan MPLA Propaganda

I am sorry if I have upset you. I completely agree with you, there is no place for MPLA propaganda in wikipedia. . It is hard to have an article about the President of the MPLA party and have no MPLA bias. It is not a place for UNITA propaganda either. That is where wikipedia needs your help. If the article is biased towards one side or the other you can constructively point it out on the talk pages before making controversial edits. I also have no doubt that you know a great deal more about Angola than I do. I don't want to sound like an Angola know it all. In fact, people like you can teach us alot. In my search to find information about Sao Tome I have learned quite a bit actually. I hope we can keep up a positive conversation.


I have never actually added anything to the JEDS page. I have only reverted edits on it. There seem to be several things that you have added in your edits that have been reverted by me or others. Here are a few of my thoughts on them.

  • JEDS was born in Sao Tome: I have found some documentation that says that JEDS might be from Sao Tome so I will include that as a footnote.
  • Changing Jonas Savimbi to Dr. Jonas Savimbi: this seems to be a fairly common way to refer to him so I see no problem with that.
  • "unelected" when referring to the president: It is hardly conventional to refer to a president as an "elected" president, it is just assumed. Likewise, to say unelected president every time he is referred to is just silly. later in the article it talks about elections and how neither candidate had the required 50% of the votes. It is my understanding the Savimbi was not willing to wait for a runoff. So by default the current candidate in power stayed in power and the country went back to war.
  • calling JEDS a dictator: No comment

I am going to add the footnote about Sao Tome and Dr. Jonas Savimbi as well as a couple of other things that you added in various revisions. Others may decide to revert them. As far as I can remember this will be the first time I have added anything to this page. After these edits I am going to retire from this page and I wont edit it or revert your edits anymore. Again, I am sorry for the misunderstanding.

--Nathan Holland 07:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] February 2007

Please do not introduce any form of vandalism to the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Vidkun. Thank you. Kesac 18:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is an shared IP address, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise the userpages of other users, as you did to User:Kesac, you will be blocked. Kesac 18:44, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is an shared IP address, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to User:Kesac, you will be blocked from editing. Kesac 18:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

If this is an shared IP address, ignore this notice if it wasn't you who made the edit.


You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

Kuru talk 18:59, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vidkun aka Lord Vader

Why is this individual Mr. Vidkun (a self styled "mason") allowed to do this

"(unsourced tag added, removed link to cabinda.net: most of these cabinda articles are also linked a few splinter masonic organisations)"

What point is he trying to make what evidence has he, and why is he allowed to do as he pleases.

I see this wikipedia nonsese as the downfall of the original idea.

Because policy states he can - unsourced information is removed per policy, and one Rui Gabirro "self-styled" Duke of Cabinda and creator of a bunch of fringe Masonic groups also owns that domain, of which there is plenty of proof. OTOH, you can't even sign a post (much less write properly), you childishly vandalize Vidkun's userpage (for which you were blocked), you claim he's someone he isn't (without proof), and yet you claim to not be at fault at all in this situation? Hm. MSJapan 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MSJapan (Microsoft Japan) Who knowns!!!

Mr. MSJapan

Dear Sir,

Thank you for pointing out the spelling issue from now on I will call you (just between me and you) Professor.

Let it be known that both Lord Vader aka Vanduck or similar and our Most Distinguished Professor of English Language are on a VENDETA (some sort of a malicious Crusade) it is deplorable that this individuals clearly abusing the Wikipedia good will to pursue their own agenda.

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to José Eduardo dos Santos has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 23:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)