User talk:195.54.243.250

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding Richmond, The American International University in London, you are free to contribute, but please do not copy and paste from the website. It is a copyright violation. Thank you. GfloresTalk 17:16, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to PFC Levski Sofia was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 12:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → 13:54, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Bombing of Guernica on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 00:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Your continued removal of the range of casualty estimates from Bombing of Guernica is beginning to look like vandalism. It is certainly an ignoring of consensus. If you have something to say about why you believe only one estimate should be given, please bring it to the talk page. - Jmabel | Talk 16:57, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Bombing of Guernica

Please do not remove information from this article without first discussing it on the article's talk page. -- Merope 21:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

The same applies to the Guernica article. There is clearly some dispute over the number of dead, though it appears that some estimates are more reliable than others. It is best to preserve all the estimates, along with the justification for why the estimate is reliable. You can address your concerns on the associated talk pages. -- Merope 21:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three-revert rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 23:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I have blocked you for tendentious editing on Bombing of Guernica agianst the apparent consensus of other editors, you were also in violation of WP:3RR. Please, when you return from the block, try to reach compromise with other editors rather than do edit warring Alex Bakharev 00:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three revert rule again...

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 22:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

YES OF COURSE PARTISAN. VERY BIG, ADDRESSING VIDAL AND LARRAZABAL AS NATIONALIST PROPAGANDA. GET A PhD INSTEAD OF WRITING THINGS THAT WERE WRITTEN 70 YEARS AGO.
My gut feeling tells me that people with PhD do not write in ALL CAPS... Then agian, I might be mistaken... -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 22:33, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

GREAT COMEBACK, GREAT ABSOLUTELY GREAT. FANTASTIC. GREAT INTERNET SITE, LET ANYONE WRITE BS AND AS SOON AS A PROFESSIONAL CORRECTS SOMETHING, YOU LET THE AMATEUR HAVE THE LAST CORRECTION. YOU ARE A ROLE MODEL.

[edit] Regarding reversions[1] made on November 5, 2006 to Bombing of Guernica

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 1 week. Alex Bakharev 23:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to War on Terrorism

Your recent edit to War on Terrorism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to European Currency Unit, you will be blocked from editing. JForget 00:58, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Animum (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Nitrogen cycle has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Richmond University

Good job on the addition and clarification of information regarding accreditation. My last edit was to clarify poor comments by a previous editor as shown below.

"NOTE:The DFES(Department for Education and Skills) in the UK DOES NOT list Richmond as a recognised degree awarding body. Please check :http://www.dfes.gov.uk/recognisedukdegrees/index.cfm?fuseaction=institutes.list"

DavidPickett (talk) 15:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dwyerj for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.Jsmith86 (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] June 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Omak, Washington. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aleenf1 03:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)