User talk:195.27.12.230

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 195.27.12.230, is registered to Siemens Business Services , and may be shared by multiple users. If the organization uses proxy servers or firewalls, this IP address may in fact represent many users at many physical computers.

For this reason, a message intended for one person may be received by another and a block may be shared by many. If you are editing from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. In some cases, you may temporarily be unable to create an account due to efforts to fight vandalism; if so, please see here.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, we encourage you to contact your Internet service provider or IT department and ask them to contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on their proxy servers so that our editing blocks will affect only the intended user. Alternatively, you can list the IP at Wikipedia:WikiProject on XFFs.

Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking - if a block is needed, administrators should consider using a soft block with the template {{anonblock|optional comment}} as the block reason.

Note: In the event of vandalism from this address, abuse reports may be sent to your network administrator for further investigation.
IT staff who want to monitor vandalism from this IP address can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. -- GraemeL (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Charles Ingram was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 14:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia, as you did in Skewen. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. –Dicty (T/C) 11:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in The Movies. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. — TKD::Talk 11:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] My comments

Hi. Please don't move my comment around, I liked it where it was. Thanks, Morwen - Talk 13:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Personal attacks

This is your only warning. The next time you make an personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. If you want an article to be kept, argue your case in terms of the Wikipedia policies, do not make personal attacks agaisnt other editors. My age, and the choice of hobbies of myself and the other people within the discussion are irrelevent. J Milburn 18:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edit to Cumberland School of Law (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 14:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ecuador, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Oxymoron83 11:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

[edit] AfD nomination of Cardiff Central to Nottingham Line

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cardiff Central to Nottingham Line, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiff Central to Nottingham Line. Thank you.  – Tivedshambo (talk) 18:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edits to Rugby, Warwickshire

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Rugby, Warwickshire worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Keith D (talk) 18:29, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ffos-y-fran, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Badgernet (talk) 10:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing.

[edit] May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to The X-Files: The Game has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)